Achieving High Quality Care

2014 ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 969-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen R. Winefield ◽  
Timothy G. Murrell ◽  
Julie Clifford

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mallory D. Woiski ◽  
Evelien Belfroid ◽  
Janine Liefers ◽  
Richard P. Grol ◽  
Hubertina C. Scheepers ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keng Chen ◽  
Stephen Shumack ◽  
Richard Wootton

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-13
Author(s):  
Michael Clark ◽  
Clare Hilton ◽  
Wendy Shiels ◽  
Carole Green ◽  
Christina Walters ◽  
...  

Praxis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 110 (15) ◽  
pp. 902-906
Author(s):  
Tanja Fusi-Schmidhauser

Abstract. Patients with advanced COPD have a high symptom burden that is often multidimensional. Identification of patients who might benefit from palliative care through validated identification tools, multidimensional symptom management, and timely discussion of advance planning are elements of a palliative care approach for these patients and their families. Coordination among stakeholders providing care and support to these patients is central to ensuring high-quality care and meeting all of their needs.


The Lancet ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 392 (10152) ◽  
pp. 990-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F G Cleland ◽  
Robin A Clark

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1044-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra G. Leggat ◽  
Cathy Balding

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review the implementation of seven components of quality systems (QSs) linked with quality improvement in a sample of Australian hospitals. Design/methodology/approach The authors completed a systematic review to identify QS components associated with measureable quality improvement. Using mixed methods, the authors then reviewed the current state of these QS components in a sample of eight Australian hospitals. Findings The literature review identified seven essential QS components. Both the self-evaluation and focus group data suggested that none of the hospitals had all of these seven components in place, and that there were some implementation issues with those components that were in use. Although board and senior executives could point to a large number of quality and safety documents that they felt were supporting a vision and framework for safe, high-quality care, middle managers and clinical staff described the QSs as compliance driven and largely irrelevant to their daily pursuit of safe, high-quality care. The authors also found little specific training in quality improvement for staff, lack of useful data for clinicians on the quality of care they provide and confusion about how organisational QSs work. Practical implications This study provides a clearer picture of why QSs are not yet achieving the results that boards and executives want to achieve, and that patients require. Originality/value This is the first study to explore the implementation of QSs in hospitals in-depth from the perspective of hospital staff, linking the findings to the implementation of QS component identified in the literature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document