Effective quality systems: implementation in Australian public hospitals

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1044-1057 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra G. Leggat ◽  
Cathy Balding

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review the implementation of seven components of quality systems (QSs) linked with quality improvement in a sample of Australian hospitals. Design/methodology/approach The authors completed a systematic review to identify QS components associated with measureable quality improvement. Using mixed methods, the authors then reviewed the current state of these QS components in a sample of eight Australian hospitals. Findings The literature review identified seven essential QS components. Both the self-evaluation and focus group data suggested that none of the hospitals had all of these seven components in place, and that there were some implementation issues with those components that were in use. Although board and senior executives could point to a large number of quality and safety documents that they felt were supporting a vision and framework for safe, high-quality care, middle managers and clinical staff described the QSs as compliance driven and largely irrelevant to their daily pursuit of safe, high-quality care. The authors also found little specific training in quality improvement for staff, lack of useful data for clinicians on the quality of care they provide and confusion about how organisational QSs work. Practical implications This study provides a clearer picture of why QSs are not yet achieving the results that boards and executives want to achieve, and that patients require. Originality/value This is the first study to explore the implementation of QSs in hospitals in-depth from the perspective of hospital staff, linking the findings to the implementation of QS component identified in the literature.

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eline Ree ◽  
Louise A. Ellis ◽  
Siri Wiig

PurposeTo discuss how managers contribute in promoting resilience in healthcare, and to suggest a model of managers' role in supporting resilience and elaborate on how future research and implementation studies can use this to further operationalize the concept and promote healthcare resilience.Design/methodology/approachThe authors first provide an overview of and discuss the main approaches to healthcare resilience and research on management and resilience. Second, the authors provide examples on how managers work to promote healthcare resilience during a one-year Norwegian longitudinal intervention study following managers in nursing homes and homecare services in their daily quality and safety work. They use this material to propose a model of management and resilience.FindingsThe authors consider managerial strategies to support healthcare resilience as the strategies managers use to engage people in collaborative and coordinated processes that adapt, enhance or reorganize system functioning, promoting possibilities of learning, growth, development and recovery of the healthcare system to maintain high quality care. The authors’ model illustrates how managers influence the healthcare systems ability to adapt, enhance and reorganize, with high quality care as the key outcome.Originality/valueIn this study, the authors argue that managerial strategies should be considered and operationalized as part of a healthcare system's overall resilience. They propose a new model of managers' role in supporting resilience to be used in practice, interventions and future research projects.


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Sandra G. Leggat ◽  
Cathy Balding

Objective To explore the impact of the organisational quality systems on quality of care in Victorian health services. Methods During 2015 a total of 55 focus groups were conducted with more than 350 managers, clinical staff and board members in eight Victorian health services to explore the effectiveness of health service quality systems. A review of the quality and safety goals and strategies outlined in the strategic and operating plans of the participating health services was also undertaken. Results This paper focuses on the data related to the leadership role of health service boards in ensuring safe, high-quality care. The findings suggest that health service boards are not fully meeting their governance accountability to ensure consistently high-quality care. The data uncovered major clinical governance gaps between stated board and executive aspirations for quality and safety and the implementation of these expectations at point of care. These gaps were further compounded by quality system confusion, over-reliance on compliance, and inadequate staff engagement. Conclusion Based on the existing evidence we propose five specific actions boards can take to close the gaps, thereby supporting improved care for all consumers. What is known about this topic? Effective governance is essential for high-quality healthcare delivery. Boards are required to play an active role in their organisation’s pursuit of high quality care. What does this paper add? Recent government reports suggest that Australian health service boards are not fully meeting their governance requirements for high quality, safe care delivery, and our research pinpoints key governance gaps. What are the implications for practitioners? Based on our research findings we outline five evidence-based actions for boards to improve their governance of quality care delivery. These actions focus on an organisational strategy for high-quality care, with the chief executive officer held accountable for successful implementation, which is actively guided and monitored by the board.


2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 152-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Scowen

Patients undergoing treatment are vulnerable and have a right to expect a high level of care. There are also certain things patients can do to help ensure they receive high-quality care. The Patient Liaison Group (PLG) believes it is important for patients to understand both their rights and their responsibilities in this process and has designed Patients' Rights and Responsibilities to provide details of both. We hope this publication will be useful to surgeons and all hospital staff dealing with surgical patients, as well as to patients themselves.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246927
Author(s):  
Godfrey Kacholi ◽  
Ozayr H. Mahomed

Background To ensure patient-centered quality care for all citizens, Quality Improvement (QI) teams have been established across all public hospitals in Tanzania. However, little is known about how hospital staff perceive the performance of hospital QI teams in Tanzania. This study assessed the perceptions of hospital staff of the performance of QI teams in selected regional referral hospitals in Tanzania. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in four selected regional referral hospitals between April and August 2018. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from 385 hospital staff in the selected hospitals. Measures of central tendency, proportions and frequencies were used to assess level of perception of hospital staff. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to test the association between the perceptions of hospital staff of the performance of QI teams and their socio-demographic factors. Results The overall mean perception score of the performance of QI teams was 4.84 ± 1.25. Hospital staff aged 35 and over (n = 130; 68%), female hospital staff (n = 144; 64%), staff in clinical units (n = 136; 63%) and staff with post-secondary education (n = 175; 63%) perceived that the performance of QI teams was good. Improved hospital cleanliness was viewed as strength of QI teams, whilst inadequate sharing of information and inadequate reduction in patient waiting time were considered as weaknesses of QI team performance. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that there was no statistical association between the perceptions of hospital staff and their socio-demographic characteristics. Conclusion The overall perception of hospital staff of the performance of QI teams was good, with the main limitation being sharing of hospital QI plans with hospital staff. Hospital staff should be involved in the development and implementation of hospital QI plans, which would promote a positive perception of staff of the performance of QI teams and enhance sustainability of QI teams.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 151-151
Author(s):  
Grant Picarillo ◽  
Natasha Jivani ◽  
Colin Nash ◽  
Kristi Mitchell

151 Background: Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) seek to promote high quality, coordinated care by eliminating unnecessary procedures, sharing clinical information, and meeting quality targets. Of the 65 proposed quality measures outlined in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP), only two relate specifically to cancer care, calling into question how such models will accelerate high quality care in oncology. Prostate cancer offers an insightful case study as it is characterized by a lack of consensus around diagnosis and treatment and the involvement of several providers throughout the care continuum. Methods: As part of a multi-layered analysis to evaluate the impact of the ACO model on quality improvement and the management and treatment of prostate cancer, Avalere examined recent legislation (e.g., the Affordable Care Act, MSSP) to identify key characteristics of the model. Avalere then reviewed the potential impact of these characteristics in oncology by examining clinical guidelines and reviewing public statements by key opinion leaders. After identifying gaps specifically related to prostate cancer, Avalere categorized the characteristics into three groups based on their potential impact on prostate cancer care: high, moderate, and low. Results: Our analysis yielded the following categorization of the ACO characteristics: High Impact: Streamlined coordination of care between facilities and providers Focus on high-risk, high-cost populations Moderate Impact: Emphasis on preventative health Standardized use of outcomes-based quality measures Low Impact: Improved medication continuity Chronic disease management Shared savings incentives Conclusions: As providers involved in prostate cancer care explore the ACO concept, it will be critical to identify the characteristics with the greatest potential to improve the quality and coordination of care, and to incorporate these characteristics into the guideline recommendations influencing the standard of care. Our research indicates that prostate cancer guidelines should emphasize the low quality and high cost of fragmented care in this patient population and develop recommendations on proven methods of care coordination and quality improvement.


Author(s):  
Michael A. West ◽  
Joanne Lyubovnikova ◽  
Regina Eckert ◽  
Jean-Louis Denis

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the challenges that health care organizations face in nurturing and sustaining cultures that ensure the delivery of continually improving, high quality and compassionate care for patients and other service users. Design/methodology/approach – Based on an extensive review of the literature, the authors examine the current and very challenging context of health care and highlight the core cultural elements needed to enable health care organizations to respond effectively to the challenges identified. Findings – The role of leadership is found to be critical for nurturing high-quality care cultures. In particular, the authors focus on the construct of collective leadership and examine how this type of leadership style ensures that all staff take responsibility for ensuring high-quality care for patients. Practical implications – Climates for quality and safety can be accomplished by the development of strategies that ensure leaders, leadership skills and leadership cultures are appropriate to meet the challenges health care organizations face in delivering continually improving, high quality, safe and compassionate patient care. Originality/value – This paper provides a comprehensive integration of research findings on how to foster quality and safety climates in healthcare organizations, synthesizing insights from academic literature, practitioner reports and policy documents to propose clear, timely and much needed practical guidelines for healthcare organizations both nationally and internationally.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra G. Leggat ◽  
Cathy Balding

Public hospitals are required to have quality systems in place to meet accreditation standards, achieve government performance expectations and continually improve care. However, previous study suggests that there has been limited success in the implementation of effective quality systems. Using document review, self-evaluation and qualitative data from interviews and focus groups of 270 board members, managers and staff we explored the implementation of quality systems in eight Australian public hospitals. Using normalisation process theory, we found that the hospitals took a technical, top-down approach to quality system implementation and did not provide staff with opportunities for socialization of the technology that enabled them to normalise the quality work. ‘Quality’ was consistently described as an ‘extra’ set of tasks to do, rather than a means to creating sustained, safe, quality care. Despite enormous goodwill and positive intent, a lack of understanding of how to effect change in the complexity of hospitals has led the boards and senior managers in our sample to execute a technical, top-down approach based on compliance and reactive risk.


1995 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 969-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen R. Winefield ◽  
Timothy G. Murrell ◽  
Julie Clifford

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document