Inherent Safety Analysis Approaches

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 135-145
Author(s):  
Yangmei Qin ◽  
Zeyi Xiao ◽  
Shimeng Guo ◽  
Jiying Zeng ◽  
Senqing Fan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Antonio Zuorro ◽  
Kariana Andrea Moreno-Sader ◽  
Ángel Darío González-Delgado

The recovery and valorization of waste are some of the key aspects of sustainable production. The crustacean exoskeletons can be potentially used to obtain value-added products such as chitosan. A comprehensive analysis including both safety and sustainability aspects of chitosan production from shrimp shells is presented in this study. The inherent safety analysis and sustainability evaluation was performed using the Inherent Safety Index (ISI) methodology and the Sustainable Weighted Return on Investment Metric (SWROIM), respectively. The process was designed for a processing capacity of 57,000 t/y according to shrimp production in Colombia. The economic (%ROI), environmental (PEI output), energy (exergy efficiency), and safety (ITI) technical parameters were included in the sustainability evaluation. The three first were obtained from the previous analysis performed by the authors. The total inherent safety index was estimated at 25 indicating that the process is inherently unsafe. The main process risks were given by the dangerous substance, reactivity, and inventory subindices. The overall sustainability evaluation showed a SWROIM of 36.23% indicating that the case study showed higher weighted performance compared to the return on investment (ROI) metric of 18.08%.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksey Sergeevich Bochkarev ◽  
Pavel Nikolaevich Alekseev ◽  
Aleksandr Sergeyevich Korsun ◽  
Vladimir Stepanovich Kharitonov

2009 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 4917-4927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nipen M. Shah ◽  
Andrew F. A. Hoadley ◽  
G. P. Rangaiah

2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 2981-2993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Li ◽  
Anand Zanwar ◽  
Abhishek Jayswal ◽  
Helen H. Lou ◽  
Yinlun Huang

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.P. Chang ◽  
Y.M. Kwon ◽  
H.Y. Jeong ◽  
S.D. Suk ◽  
Y.B. Lee

Author(s):  
Stephen Yu ◽  
Zoran Bilanovic ◽  
Patrick Reid ◽  
Paul Santamaura ◽  
Mike Soulard

The ACR-1000™ design has evolved from AECL’s in depth knowledge of CANDU® systems, components and materials based on the CANDU 6 design, as well as the experience and feedback received from owners and operators of CANDU plants. The ACR® design retains the proven strengths and features of CANDU reactors, while incorporating innovations and state-of-the-art technology. It also features major improvements in inherent safety characteristics, safety margin and operational performance. The ACR design has been reviewed by domestic and international regulatory bodies, and has been given a positive regulatory opinion about its licensability in Canada and internationally. The Canadian regulator, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) completed the Phase 1 [1] and Phase 2 [2] pre-project design reviews in December 2008 and August 2009 respectively, and concluded that there are no fundamental barriers to licensing the ACR-1000 design in Canada. The generic PSAR for ACR-1000 was completed in September 2009. The PSAR contains the ACR-1000 design details, the safety and design methodology, and the safety analysis that demonstrate ACR-1000 safety case and compliance with Canadian and international regulatory requirements and expectations. The final stage of the ACR-1000 design is currently underway including documentation and additional confirmatory analysis, and the basic engineering will be completed in 2011. This paper provides an overview of the ACR-1000 design including a summary of the safety methodology used and compliance with regulatory and customer requirements, along with a demonstration of how modern expectations on safety margins and operational performance (i.e., typically characterized as Generation III+) are met. It also provides a summary of the safety analysis results (both deterministic and probabilistic) from the generic safety analysis that has been completed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-298
Author(s):  
A.S. Bochkarev ◽  
P.N. Alekseev ◽  
A.S. Korsun ◽  
V.S. Kharitonov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document