Reaction Time-based Detection of Concealed Information in Relation to Individual Differences in Executive Functioning

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 342-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Visu-Petra ◽  
Mircea Miclea ◽  
Laura Visu-Petra
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Reaction Time ◽  
Executive Functioning ◽  
Concealed Information ◽  
Detection Of Concealed Information

scholarly journals Bed Rest and Cognition: Effects on Executive Functioning and Reaction Time

2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (12) ◽  
pp. 1018-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darren M. Lipnicki ◽  
Hanns-Christian Gunga ◽  
Daniel L. Belavý ◽  
Dieter Felsenberg
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Executive Functioning ◽  
Bed Rest

Detection of Concealed Information: Combining a Virtual Mock Crime with a P300-based Guilty Knowledge Test

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinsun Hahm ◽  
Hyung Ki Ji ◽  
Je Young Jeong ◽  
Dong Hoon Oh ◽  
Seok Hyeon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Test ◽  
Guilty Knowledge Test ◽  
Mock Crime ◽  
Information Combining ◽  
Concealed Information ◽  
Detection Of Concealed Information

scholarly journals Familiarity-based fillers improve the validity of reaction time-based memory detection

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Verschuere ◽  
Gáspár Lukács ◽  
Bennett Kleinberg
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Concealed Information Test ◽  
Test Protocol ◽  
Single Probe ◽  
Multiple Probe ◽  
Concealed Information ◽  
Information Test

The reaction time (RT)-based Concealed Information Test (CIT) allows for the detection of concealed knowledge (e.g., one’s true identity) when the questions are presented randomly (multiple-probe protocol), but its performance is much weaker when questions are presented in blocks (e.g., first question about surname, then about birthday; single-probe protocol). The latter test protocol, however, is the preferred and sometimes even the only feasible interviewing method in real-life. In a first, pre-registered, experiment (n = 363), we show that the validity of the single-probe protocol version can be substantially improved by including familiarity-related filler trials (e.g., “KNOWN,” “UNKNOWN”). We replicated these findings in a second, preregistered, experiment (n = 237), where we further found that the use of familiarity-related fillers even improved the classic multiple-probe protocol. We recommend the use of familiarity-related filler trials for the RT-based CIT.

Individual Differences in Arm Strength, Speed, Reaction Time, and Three Serial Reaction Time-Movement Time “Programs”

1968 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 651-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leon E. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Reaction Time ◽  
Motor Performance ◽  
Movement Time ◽  
College Men ◽  
Serial Reaction Time ◽  
Limb Movements ◽  
Serial Reaction ◽  
Arm Strength ◽  
Time Movement

The motor performance of 32 college men was measured on the following tests: arm strength, arm reaction and movement times, arm-and-leg serial reaction and movement times. Specificity of variance of individual differences was found for single, simple, and discrete limb movements and for three programmed series of large RT-MT movements which involved 240 responses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document