Soft Robotics: Review of Fluid-Driven Intrinsically Soft Devices; Manufacturing, Sensing, Control, and Applications in Human-Robot Interaction

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1700016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Polygerinos ◽  
Nikolaus Correll ◽  
Stephen A. Morin ◽  
Bobak Mosadegh ◽  
Cagdas D. Onal ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (130) ◽  
pp. 20170101 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Calisti ◽  
G. Picardi ◽  
C. Laschi

Soft robotics and its related technologies enable robot abilities in several robotics domains including, but not exclusively related to, manipulation, manufacturing, human–robot interaction and locomotion. Although field applications have emerged for soft manipulation and human–robot interaction, mobile soft robots appear to remain in the research stage, involving the somehow conflictual goals of having a deformable body and exerting forces on the environment to achieve locomotion. This paper aims to provide a reference guide for researchers approaching mobile soft robotics, to describe the underlying principles of soft robot locomotion with its pros and cons, and to envisage applications and further developments for mobile soft robotics.


Soft Robotics ◽  
2015 ◽  
pp. 231-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Wolf ◽  
Thomas Bahls ◽  
Maxime Chalon ◽  
Werner Friedl ◽  
Markus Grebenstein ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Jørgensen ◽  
Mads Bering Christiansen

In this article, we report on research and creative practice that explores the aesthetic interplay between movement and sound for soft robotics. Our inquiry seeks to interrogate what sound designs might be aesthetically engaging and appropriate for soft robotic movement in a social human-robot interaction setting. We present the design of a soft sound-producing robot, SONŌ, made of pliable and expandable silicone and three sound designs made for this robot. The article comprises an articulation of the underlying design process and results from two empirical interaction experiments (N = 66, N = 60) conducted to evaluate the sound designs. The sound designs did not have statistically significant effects on people’s perception of the social attributes of two different soft robots. Qualitative results, however, indicate that people’s interpretations of the sound designs depend on robot type.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Prewett ◽  
Kristin N. Saboe ◽  
Ryan C. Johnson ◽  
Michael D. Coovert ◽  
Linda R. Elliott

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanore Edson ◽  
Judith Lytle ◽  
Thomas McKenna

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document