Spondyloarthritis research consortium of canada magnetic resonance imaging index for assessment of spinal inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis

2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter P. Maksymowych ◽  
Robert D. Inman ◽  
David Salonen ◽  
Suhkvinder S. Dhillon ◽  
Ruben Krishnananthan ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 1728-1734 ◽  
Author(s):  
WALTER P. MAKSYMOWYCH ◽  
DAVID SALONEN ◽  
ROBERT D. INMAN ◽  
PROTON RAHMAN ◽  
ROBERT G.W. LAMBERT

Objective.To evaluate the influence of low-dose infliximab (IFX) on spinal inflammation scored by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The dose recommended for rheumatoid arthritis (3 mg/kg) is also clinically effective for ankylosing spondylitis (AS), although effects on spinal inflammation as defined by MRI have yet to be described in a placebo-controlled trial.Methods.In a 12-week double-blind period, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either IFX 3 mg/kg at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, or placebo. Spinal inflammation in discovertebral units (DVU) was measured by the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI Index at baseline and 12 weeks by 3 readers blinded to timepoint and treatment allocation. We also compared reliability and discrimination of the SPARCC MRI index based on evaluation of the entire spine (23 DVU score) compared to assessment of only the 6 most severely affected DVU (6 DVU score).Results.At Week 12, patients treated with IFX experienced mean reductions of 55.1% and 57.2% in the 6 DVU and 23 DVU SPARCC scores, respectively, compared with a mean increase of 5.8% and decrease of 3.4% in 6 DVU and 23 DVU scores, respectively, for patients taking placebo (p < 0.001). A large treatment effect (Guyatt’s effect size ≥ 1.7) and high reliability was evident and comparable between 6 DVU and 23 DVU scoring methods.Conclusion.Treatment with low-dose IFX leads to a large treatment effect on spinal inflammation as measured by MRI. Scoring for inflammation of only the most severely affected regions of the spine by MRI is comparable to assessment of the entire spine.


2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1666-1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
WALTER P. MAKSYMOWYCH ◽  
ROBERT G. LAMBERT ◽  
L. STEVEN BROWN ◽  
AILEEN L. PANGAN

Objective.To define the minimally important change (MIC) in the SpondyloArthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) spine and sacroiliac (SI) joint magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indices in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.Methods.MRI scans were performed during a placebo-controlled trial of adalimumab (no. NCT00195819). Two independent readers, blinded to treatment and sequence, determined SPARCC scores for the spine and SI joints and a global evaluation of change (GEC; “much worse,” “worse,” “no change,” “better,” or “much better”; categories other than “no change” were pooled together as “change”) between baseline–Week 12, baseline–Week 52, and Weeks 12–52. Mean absolute changes in SPARCC scores (95% CI) were calculated for each interval, treatment group, and GEC. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the MIC. Relationships of MIC to clinical responses were examined.Results.Reader agreement on GEC evaluations was > 70%. Changes in SPARCC scores were generally comparable between time intervals and treatment groups for “change” and “no change” categories and were combined for each category; change in score was significantly associated with GEC of “change” (area under ROC curves: spine 0.839; SI joints 0.960). ROC curves peaked at values of 5.0 for the spine and 2.5 for SI joints. Placebo-treated patients achieving > 2.5 unit improvement in SI joint score had significantly better clinical responses than placebo-treated patients who did not achieve such improvement. MRI and clinical responses were uncoupled in adalimumab-treated patients.Conclusion.We propose that changes of 5.0 for the spine and 2.5 for SI joints define the MIC for the SPARCC MRI indices.


2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 703-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter P. Maksymowych ◽  
Robert D. Inman ◽  
David Salonen ◽  
Suhkvinder S. Dhillon ◽  
Martin Williams ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1891-1896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xenofon Baraliakos ◽  
Joachim Listing ◽  
Hildrun Haibel ◽  
Joachim Sieper ◽  
Jurgen Braun

Objective.Spinal inflammation and erosions have been described in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). MRI scoring systems have implemented these observations.Methods.MRI scans (T1 or short-tau inversion recovery) from tumor necrosis factor-α blocker (anti-TNF) trials with patients with active AS (n = 22) were analyzed at baseline and after 2 years based on vertebral units (VU). The analysis was based on the prevalence of spinal erosions in relation to inflammation (active erosions) or without it (inactive erosions) as an outcome measure on MRI and their course under anti-TNF therapy. The results of MRI scoring systems that include (ASspiMRI) or exclude (Berlin score) erosions were also compared.Results.At baseline, there were more VU with inflammation (33.7%) than with erosions irrespective of activity (10.6%). After 2 years, active erosions decreased to 3.7% while inflammation was seen in a total of 12% of VU — a reduction of 58.9% and 64.5%, respectively (both p < 0.02). The overall extent of erosions decreased from 10.6% at baseline to 5.6% at 2 years. At the patient level, 73% and 32% of patients showed active erosions (p = 0.002), while 100% and 64% of patients showed inflammation (p = 0.029) at baseline and 2 years, respectively. Both scoring systems showed similar improvement, independent of inclusion or exclusion of erosions.Conclusion.Inflammation with erosions was observed in the spine of most patients with AS but their contribution to changes observed upon anti-TNF therapy was small, indicating that erosions do not need to be included in quantitative scoring systems of inflammation. Spinal inflammation was still present after 2 years of anti-TNF therapy in two-thirds of patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document