Ultraviolet advanced oxidation for indirect and direct potable reuse in California

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Bernados
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (0) ◽  
pp. 9781780408477-9781780408477
Author(s):  
A. Salveson ◽  
E. Steinle-Darling ◽  
S. Trussell ◽  
B. Pecson ◽  
L. Macpherson

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-29
Author(s):  
Justin Mattingly ◽  
Robert Raucher ◽  
George Tchobanoglous

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (4) ◽  
pp. 5840-5853
Author(s):  
R Aflaki ◽  
J Munoz ◽  
M Ruiz ◽  
D Galbreath ◽  
W Mitch ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (12) ◽  
pp. 2340-2347 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.S Kumar ◽  
A Salveson ◽  
D.K Ammerman ◽  
E Steinle-Darling ◽  
J.A Jackson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (6) ◽  
pp. 59-65
Author(s):  
Manisha Kothari ◽  
Paula Kehoe ◽  
Andrea F Corral ◽  
Nicola Fontaine ◽  
Mark Millan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
Steve Via ◽  
George Tchobanoglous

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian B. Law

Australia has had guidelines in place for water recycling (for all uses other than potable reuse) since 2006. These guidelines were extended in May 2008 to cover potable reuse and have since been applied to two potable reuse schemes – one in Brisbane (Queensland) in 2011 and the second in Perth (Western Australia) in 2013. These guidelines cover both indirect potable reuse and direct potable reuse (DPR) and outline the steps that must be followed in the planning and validation of such schemes. This paper summarizes: (i) recent work carried out in Australia on treatment trains and technologies suitable for DPR; (ii) sustainability considerations of DPR and how it compares with other water supply options; and (iii) developments in community education and engagement in the potable reuse space.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document