A strategic approach for the design and operation of two-phase partitioning bioscrubbers for the treatment of volatile organic compounds

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1777-1786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Ho Yeom ◽  
Andrew J. Daugulis ◽  
David R. Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Volatile Organic Compounds ◽  
Organic Compounds ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase Partitioning ◽  
Strategic Approach ◽  
Volatile Organic

scholarly journals Synthesis and toxicity evaluation of hydrophobic ionic liquids for volatile organic compounds biodegradation in a two-phase partitioning bioreactor

2016 ◽  
Vol 307 ◽  
pp. 221-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Santiago Rodriguez Castillo ◽  
Solène Guihéneuf ◽  
Rémy Le Guével ◽  
Pierre-François Biard ◽  
Ludovic Paquin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ionic Liquids ◽  
Volatile Organic Compounds ◽  
Organic Compounds ◽  
Toxicity Evaluation ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase Partitioning ◽  
Partitioning Bioreactor ◽  
Volatile Organic ◽  
Hydrophobic Ionic Liquids ◽  
Two Phase Partitioning Bioreactor

Recent advances in two-phase partitioning bioreactors for the treatment of volatile organic compounds

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 1707-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raúl Muñoz ◽  
Andrew J. Daugulis ◽  
María Hernández ◽  
Guillermo Quijano
Keyword(s):  
Volatile Organic Compounds ◽  
Organic Compounds ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase Partitioning ◽  
Recent Advances ◽  
Volatile Organic

Two-phase partitioning bioreactors for treatment of volatile organic compounds

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raul Muñoz ◽  
Santiago Villaverde ◽  
Benoit Guieysse ◽  
Sergio Revah
Keyword(s):  
Volatile Organic Compounds ◽  
Organic Compounds ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Phase Partitioning ◽  
Volatile Organic

Vapor-phase partitioning of volatile organic compounds: A regression approach

1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1377-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon R. Thoms ◽  
Leonard W. Lion
Keyword(s):  
Volatile Organic Compounds ◽  
Organic Compounds ◽  
Vapor Phase ◽  
Phase Partitioning ◽  
Volatile Organic ◽  
Regression Approach

Bioscrubbing as a treatment for a complex mixture of volatile organic compounds: influence of the absorption column characteristics on performanceThis article is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue on Biological Air Treatment.

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 1926-1934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc Malhautier ◽  
Franck Lalanne ◽  
Jean-Louis Fanlo
Keyword(s):  
Volatile Organic Compounds ◽  
Organic Compounds ◽  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Complex Mixture ◽  
Hydrodynamic Characteristics ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Absorption Column ◽  
Oxygenated Compounds ◽  
Volatile Organic

A semi-industrial bioscrubber was developed to treat a complex mixture of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including oxygenated, aromatic, and chlorinated compounds. Packed and atomizing columns were used for the bioscrubber. For an applied inlet load of around 850–870 g VOCs·m–3 packing material·h–1, the various performances of the bioscrubber were equivalent (around 50%), regardless of the selected absorption column. Only the removal efficiency of oxygenated compounds was found to be reasonable, close to 80%–85%. For the bioscrubber equipped with an atomizing column, a doubling of the inlet load involved a decrease in the removal efficiency of the VOC mixture (35%) and oxygenated compounds (from 80% to 55%). As the transferred compounds were biodegraded, the limits could be explained by the hydrodynamic characteristics of the atomizing column. Furthermore, these results demonstrate the necessity of optimizing the gas–liquid mass transfer step. Two-phase partitioning bioreactors seem to represent an attractive option, even though knowledge of the transfer of compounds and biodegradation mechanisms is required prior to scale-up and industrial use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document