Long-term results of carotid stenting and risk factors in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis undergoing subsequent cardiac surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. E134-E139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Najibullah Habib ◽  
Bakhtawar K. Mahmoodi ◽  
Maarten J. Suttorp ◽  
Johannes C. Kelder ◽  
Selma C. Tromp ◽  
...  
Angiology ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 338-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Walter ◽  
Volkmar Bänfer ◽  
Thomas Menge ◽  
Martin Staguhn ◽  
Ernst Kohlmeyer ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosmas I. Paraskevas ◽  
Dimitri P. Mikhailidis ◽  
Frank J. Veith

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as a potential alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the management of carotid artery stenosis. The purpose of this article is to provide an evaluation and critical overview of the trials comparing the early and later results of CAS with CEA for symptomatic carotid stenosis. The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, PubMed/Medline, and EMBASE databases were searched up to February 1, 2009, to identify trials comparing the long-term outcomes of CAS with CEA. The MeSH terms used were “carotid artery stenting,” “carotid endarterectomy,” “symptomatic carotid artery stenosis,” “treatment,” “clinical trial,” “randomized,” and “long-term results,” in various combinations. One single-center and three multicenter randomized studies reporting their long-term results from the comparison of CAS with CEA for symptomatic carotid stenosis were identified. All four studies independently reached the conclusion that CAS may not provide results equivalent to those of CEA for the management of symptomatic carotid stenosis. A higher incidence of recurrent stenosis and peri- and postprocedural events accounted for the inferior results reported for CAS compared with CEA. Current data from randomized studies indicate that CAS provides inferior long-term results compared with CEA for the management of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. However, it can be argued that all of these trials were performed when both CAS equipment and CAS operators had not evolved to their current status. Given that current equipment and mature experience are required for CAS before comparing it with the current “gold standard” procedure (CEA), the results of soon-to-be reported trials (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial [CREST], International Carotid Stenting Study [ICSS], or others) may alter the current impression that CAS is inferior to CEA for the treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis.


Cardiology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsien-Li Kao ◽  
Lian-Yu Lin ◽  
Chien-Jung Lu ◽  
Jiann-Shing Jeng ◽  
Ping-Keung Yip ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc S. Randall ◽  
Fiona M. McKevitt ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar ◽  
Trevor J. Cleveland ◽  
Keith Endean ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document