Abstract
Background
Bifurcation lesions represent 20% of all coronary lesions treated by percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Although provisional technique with 1 stent in the main branch and balloon angioplasty of the side branch is considered the standard approach, the implantation of 2 stents is often being pursued with a wide variety of bifurcation stenting techniques. We thus conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to compare clinical cardiovascular outcomes involving stenting techniques in coronary bifurcation lesions.
Methods
We searched on Pubmed, Google Scholar, Embase and Cochrane Library, up to October 2018 for published and unpublished RCTs that compared clinical cardiovascular outcomes in patients with bifurcation lesions treated with 7different techniques (crush [Cr]; culotte [Cu]; double kissing crush [DKCr], mini-crush [mCr], routine T-stenting [RTS], T-stenting and small protrusion [TAP], and provisional (1 stent technique)). We performed a frequentist fixed-effect network meta-analysis to estimate relative risks (RR) of major adverse cardiovascular events (“MACE”, typically defined as death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization), target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis (ST).
Results
We identified 14 studies, yielding data on 4285 patients. DKCr and mCr yielded significant reductions in MACE, TVR, and TLR when compared with the 1-stent technique (RR 0.31–0.55 [all P<0.01] and RR 0.42–0.45 [all P<0.02], respectively) and with the rest of the bifurcation techniques (RR 0.44–0.55 [all P<0.05] for DKCr and RR 0.37–0.45 [all P<0.05] for mCr). On the other hand, Cu and Cr were associated with an increased risk for ST compared to 1-stent technique (RR 3.25–4.27 [both P<0.05]) and to DKCr (RR 3.02–3.99 [both P<0.05]). We found no heterogeneity nor inconsistency between studies.
Conclusions
The various PCI bifurcation stenting techniques are associated with different cardiovascular outcomes, with double kissing crush and mini crush being more effective than others, including the 1-stent approach, whereas culotte and crush are associated with increased risk of stent thrombosis.
Acknowledgement/Funding
None
Critical aspects of balloon position during final proximal optimization technique (POT) in coronary bifurcation stenting
