<p>The topic of downward continuation (DWC) has been studied for many decades without very conclusive answers on how different methods compare with each other. On the other hand, there are vast amounts of airborne gravity data collected by the GRAV-D project at NGS NOAA of the United States and by many other groups around the world. These airborne gravity data are collected on flight lines where the height of the aircraft actually varies significantly, and this causes challenges for users of the data. A downward continued gravity grid either on the topography or on the geoid is still needed for many applications such as improving the resolution of a local geoid model. Four downward continuation methods, i.e., Residual Least Squares Collocation (RLSC), the Inverse Poisson Integral, Truncated Spherical Harmonic Analysis, and Radial Basis Functions (RBF), are tested on both simulated data sets and real GRAV-D airborne gravity data in a previous joint study between NGS NOAA and CGS NRCan. The study group is further expanded by adding the TU Delft group on RBF and the TUM group on RLSC to incorporate more updated knowledge in the theoretical background and more in-depth discussion on the numerical results. A formal study group will be established inside IAG for providing the best answers for downward continuing airborne gravity data for local gravity field improvement. In this presentation, we review and compare the four methods theoretically and numerically. Simulated and real airborne and terrestrial data are used for the numerical comparison over block MS05 of the GRAV-D project in Colorado, USA, where the 1cm geoid experiment was performed by 15 international teams. The conclusion drawn from this study will advance the use of GRAV-D data for the new North American-Pacific Geopotential Datum of 2022 (NAPGD2022).</p>
Improvement of Downward Continuation Values of Airborne Gravity Data in Taiwan
