Open‐Label, Randomized, Single‐Dose, 2‐Period, 2‐Sequence Crossover, Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate Bioequivalence of 2 Oral Formulations of Olanzapine Under Fasting and Fed Conditions

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 621-628
Author(s):  
Ping Du ◽  
Pengfei Li ◽  
Hongchuan Liu ◽  
Rui Zhao ◽  
Zhixia Zhao ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Lucía Montoya-Eguía ◽  
Lourdes Garza-Ocañas ◽  
Christian Tadeo Badillo-Castañeda ◽  
Eduardo Tamez-de la O ◽  
Teresa Zanatta-Calderón ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Luis Poo ◽  
Juan Francisco Galán ◽  
Alejandra Rosete ◽  
Alberto de Lago ◽  
Iván Oliva ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuleegone Sornsuvit ◽  
Darunee Hongwiset ◽  
Songwut Yotsawimonwat ◽  
Manatchaya Toonkum ◽  
Satawat Thongsawat ◽  
...  

The present study aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters and bioavailability of silymarin 140 mg SMEDDS formulation. An open-label, single-dose pharmacokinetic study was conducted. Twelve healthy volunteers were included in the study. After the volunteers had fasted overnight for 10 h, a single-dose generic silymarin 140 mg SMEDDS soft capsule was administered. Then 10 ml blood samples were taken at 0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, 1.33, 1.67, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0, and 12.0 h. The plasma silybin concentrations were analyzed using validated LC-MS/MS. The pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed and calculated. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated after silymarin had been administered as a single capsule. The mean (range) Cmax was 812.43 (259.47–1505.47) ng/ml at 0.80 (0.25–1.67) h (tmax). The mean (range) AUC0-t and AUC0-inf were 658.80 (268.29–1045.01) ng.h/ml and 676.98 (274.10–1050.96) ng.h/ml, respectively. The mean ke and t1/2 were 0.5386 h-1 and 1.91 h, respectively. The silymarin SMEDDS formulation soft capsule showed rapid absorption and high oral bioavailability.


2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 753-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatta B. Nahab ◽  
Loretta Wittevrongel ◽  
Dominic Ippolito ◽  
Camilo Toro ◽  
George J Grimes ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shefali Thanawala ◽  
Rajat Shah ◽  
KrishnaRaju Venkata Alluri ◽  
Venkateswarlu Somepalli ◽  
Sanjay Vaze ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The therapeutic utility of turmeric (Curcuma longa L., Zingiberaceae) is limited due to low bioavailability of its active principal curcuminoids. This study evaluates the pharmacokinetic characteristics of a natural, water-dispersible turmeric extract containing 60% curcuminoids (TurmXtra 60N), referred to as WDTE60N, compared to standard turmeric extract 95% (STE95). Methods This open-label, two-way crossover, single oral dose, comparative pharmacokinetic study, randomized 14 subjects to receive one capsule of WDTE60N (150 mg curcuminoids) or three capsules of STE95 (500 mg curcuminoids each). The resulting dose ratio of actives for WDTE60N:STE95 was 1:10. Key findings Peak plasma levels of free curcumin, total curcuminoids, tetrahydrocurcumin and demethoxycurcumin were similar (P > 0.05). Cmax of total curcumin was higher (P = 0.0253) for WDTE60N at a 10-fold lower dose compared to STE95 (43.5 ± 28.5 vs. 21.3 ± 10.7 ng/ml). Mean AUC0-t was higher (P < 0.001) for free curcumin and comparable for total curcumin and total curcuminoids with WDTE60N than with STE95. Five adverse events were reported in three subjects (mild in severity) and were unrelated to study products. Conclusion WDTE60N showed higher absorption and comparable exposure for free curcumin, total curcumin and total curcuminoids at a 10-fold lower dose than STE95.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document