Response to nematicide by cotton genotypes varying in reniform nematode resistance

Crop Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Koebernick ◽  
G. Kaplan ◽  
K. Lawrence ◽  
J. Patel ◽  
R. Sikkens

Author(s):  
John E. Erpelding ◽  
Salliana R. Stetina


Crop Science ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Weaver ◽  
Kathy S. Lawrence ◽  
Edzard Santen


2018 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Erpelding ◽  
Salliana R. Stetina


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariola Usovsky ◽  
Naoufal Lakhssassi ◽  
Gunvant B. Patil ◽  
Tri D. Vuong ◽  
Sarbottam Piya ◽  
...  


2016 ◽  
pp. 308-312
Author(s):  
Yi-Chen Lee ◽  
David A. Lightfoot ◽  
James Anderson ◽  
Robert T. Robbins ◽  
Stella K. Kantartzi


Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1974
Author(s):  
Bhupinder Singh ◽  
Daryl R. Chastain ◽  
Kambham Raja Reddy ◽  
John L. Snider ◽  
L. Jason Krutz ◽  
...  

Soil fertility and reniform nematode (RN) directly affect earlyseason growth and physiology of cotton. The growth responses to soil fertility and RN may, however, vary across germplasm. A greenhouse study was conducted to gain information on the role that host plant resistance plays in influencing RN populations, and cotton growth and physiological response to a range of soil nitrogen (N) levels in the presence and absence of RN. RN-resistant cotton lines (08SS110-NE06.OP and 08SS100) along with susceptible cultivars (Deltapine 16 and PHY 490 W3FE) were subjected to four levels of N from planting until biomass harvesting, 60 days after planting(DAP), under the presence orabsence of RN. The linear and quadratic functions (r2 = 0.72 to 0.99) bestdescribed measured responses of cotton genotypes to soil N. However, the responses were not different among genotypes, except for plant height at 30 DAP. This study revealed significant increases in several morphological parameters with increasing rates of N. RN population in the pots grown with resistant lines was lower whencompared to susceptible cultivars at biomassharvest. Physiological responses indicated that 08SS110-NE06.OP was more resilient to RN stress than other genotypes. The information from this study could be useful in managing the early season growth of cotton.



1979 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 313-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. V. Rebois ◽  
R. E. Webb


2019 ◽  
Vol 138 (6) ◽  
pp. 871-879
Author(s):  
John E. Erpelding ◽  
Salliana R. Stetina


2016 ◽  
pp. 308-312
Author(s):  
Yi-Chen Lee ◽  
David A. Lightfoot ◽  
James Anderson ◽  
Robert T. Robbins ◽  
Stella K. Kantartzi


2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 532-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Churamani Khanal ◽  
Edward C. McGawley ◽  
Charles Overstreet ◽  
Salliana R. Stetina

The reniform nematode (Rotylenchulus reniformis Linford and Oliveira) has emerged as the most important plant-parasitic nematode of cotton in the United States cotton belt. Success in the development of reniform nematode-resistant upland cotton cultivars (Gossypium hirsutum L.) has not been realized despite over three decades of breeding efforts. Research approaches ranging from conventional breeding to triple species hybrids to marker-assisted selection have been employed to introgress reniform nematode resistance from other species of cotton into upland cultivars. Reniform nematode-resistant breeding lines derived from G. longicalyx were developed in 2007. However, these breeding lines displayed stunting symptoms and a hypersensitive response to reniform nematode infection. Subsequent breeding efforts focused on G. barbadense, G. aridum, G. armoreanum, and other species that have a high level of resistance to reniform nematode. Marker-assisted selection has greatly improved screening of reniform nematode-resistant lines. The use of advanced molecular techniques such as CRISPER-Cas9 systems and alternative ways such as delivery of suitable “cry” proteins and specific double-stranded RNA to nematodes will assist in developing resistant cultivars of cotton. In spite of the efforts of cotton breeders and nematologists, successes are limited only to the development of reniform nematode-resistant breeding lines. In this article, we provide an overview of the approaches employed to develop reniform nematode-resistant upland cotton cultivars in the past, progress to date, major obstacles, and some promising future research activity.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document