The ponderous evolution of corporate environmental reporting in Ireland. Recent evidence from publicly listed companies

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan O'Dwyer
2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianxi Zhang ◽  
Simon S. Gao ◽  
Jane J. Zhang

While the literature has given a considerable attention to internet financial reporting, limited studies mainly from developed economies have emerged to explain and predict corporate behavior relating to corporaten environmental reporting on Websites. This preliminary study attempts<br />to fill a gap by investigating Internet environmental reporting (IER)<br />in China and examining the current IER practice of Chinese top listed companies. This study finds that IER is increasingly used in China to disclose corporate social and environmental activity and policy. Companies are increasingly using the phrases of „sustainability‟ and „corporate social responsibility‟ in their IER. Website-specific reporting concerning social and environmental issues, performance and activities has growingly been adopted by Chinese top listed companies as the main approach to IER. Both the quantity of disclosure and the areas of coverage have steadily<br />increased. While IER in China is developing, there remains a considerable discrepancy in terms of reporting practices and the levels of social and environmental information disclosed. There are no generally accepted standards and guidelines for IER in China, and the data/information disclosed are largely incomparable. External auditing of IER remains a problem.<br /><br />


2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruslaina Yusoff ◽  
Shariful Amran Abd Rahman ◽  
Wan Nazihah Wan Mohamed

This study was carried out to examine the economic consequences ofvoluntary environmental reporting on shareholders' wealth among Malaysian Listed Companies that voluntarily disclosed environmental information in their financial report. One hundred andfifty two (152) companies of Bursa Malaysia (MSE) had been identified as a sample in the current study. Seventy six (76) companies were classified as environmental reporting companies while the remaining companies were classified as non-environmental reporting companies. The classification was done in order to determine the differences between share price, profitability and market equity for both types of companies. The study hypothesizes that voluntary environmental reporting leads to an improvement in the shareholders wealth. However, the results show that there is no significant difference between cumulative abnormal return for environmental and non-environmental reporting companies. Based on the results obtained, it can also be concluded that profitability and size of the companies do not have any significant roles in deciding whether or not to produce environmental reporting companies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document