scholarly journals Tissue flow cytometry immunophenotyping in the diagnosis and classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: A retrospective evaluation of 1,792 cases

2013 ◽  
Vol 84B (2) ◽  
pp. 82-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Demurtas ◽  
Alessandra Stacchini ◽  
Sabrina Aliberti ◽  
Luigi Chiusa ◽  
Roberto Chiarle ◽  
...  
1980 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Elaine S. Jaffe ◽  
Raul C. Braylan ◽  
Koji Nanba ◽  
Costan W. Berard

Cancer ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1122-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence W. Diamond ◽  
Bharat N. Nathwani ◽  
Henry Rappaport

2008 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 462-475
Author(s):  
Randall J. Olsen ◽  
Chung-Che Chang ◽  
Jennifer L. Herrick ◽  
Youli Zu ◽  
Aamir Ehsan

Abstract Context.—The diagnosis and classification of leukemia is becoming increasingly complex. Current classification schemes incorporate morphologic features, immunophenotype, molecular genetics, and clinical data to specifically categorize leukemias into various subtypes. Although sophisticated methodologies are frequently used to detect characteristic features conferring diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic implications, a thorough microscopic examination remains essential to the pathologic evaluation. Detailed blast immunophenotyping can be performed with lineage- and maturation-specific markers. Although no one marker is pathognomonic for one malignancy, a well-chosen panel of antibodies can efficiently aid the diagnosis and classification of acute leukemias. Objective.—To review important developments from recent and historical literature. General immunohistochemical staining patterns of the most commonly encountered lymphoid and myeloid leukemias are emphasized. The goal is to discuss the immunostaining of acute leukemias when flow cytometry and genetic studies are not available. Data Sources.—A comprehensive review was performed of the relevant literature indexed in PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and referenced medical texts. Additional references were identified in the reviewed manuscripts. Conclusions.—Immunophenotyping of blasts using an immunohistochemical approach to lymphoid and myeloid malignancies is presented. Initial and subsequent additional antibody panels are suggested to confirm or exclude each possibility in the differential diagnosis and a general strategy for diagnostic evaluation is discussed. Although the use of immunohistochemistry alone is limited and evaluation by flow cytometry and genetic studies is highly recommended, unavoidable situations requiring analysis of formalin-fixed tissue specimens arise. When performed in an optimized laboratory and combined with a careful morphologic examination, the immunohistochemical approach represents a useful laboratory tool for classifying various leukemias.


2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (12) ◽  
pp. 1792-1799 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Siebert ◽  
Lori M. Weeks ◽  
Larry W. List ◽  
John W. Kugler ◽  
James A. Knost ◽  
...  

Abstract Context.—Flow cytometry immunophenotyping (FC) of needle aspiration/biopsy (NAB) samples has been reported to be useful for the diagnosis and classification of lymphoma in university and cancer center–based settings. Nevertheless, there is no agreement on the utility of these methods. Objective.—To further define the utility of adjunctive FC of clinical NAB for the diagnosis and classification of lymphoma, and to determine if this approach is practicable in a routine clinical practice setting. Setting.—A community-based hospital. Methods.—Clinical NABs were submitted for adjunctive FC between June 1996 and September 1999 if initial smears were suspicious for lymphoma. Smears and cell block or needle core tissues were routinely processed and paraffin-section immunostains were performed if indicated. The final diagnosis was determined by correlating clinical and pathologic data, and the revised European-American classification criteria were used to subtype lymphomas. Results.—Needle aspiration/biopsies from 60 different patients were submitted for FC. Final diagnoses were lymphoma (n = 38), other neoplasm (n = 15), benign (n = 6), or insufficient (n = 1). For 38 lymphomas (20 primary, 18 recurrent), patients ranged in age from 32 to 86 years (mean, 62 years); samples were obtained from the retroperitoneum (n = 11), lymph node (n = 9), abdomen (n = 8), mediastinum (n = 6), or other site (n = 4); and lymphoma subtypes were indolent B-cell (n = 20; 2 small lymphocytic, 14 follicle center, 4 not subtyped), aggressive B-cell (n = 14; 3 mantle cell, 10 large cell, 1 not subtyped), B-cell not further specified (n = 2), or Hodgkin disease (n = 2). For the diagnosis of these lymphomas, FC was necessary in 20 cases, useful in 14 cases, not useful in 2 cases, and misleading in 2 cases. Thirty-two of 36 lymphoma patients with follow-up data received antitumor therapy based on the results of NAB plus FC. Conclusions.—Adjunctive FC of NABs is potentially practicable in a community hospital, is necessary or useful for the diagnosis and subtyping of most B-cell lymphomas, and can help direct lymphoma therapy. Repeated NAB or surgical biopsy is necessary for diagnosis or treatment in some cases.


2015 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Matarraz ◽  
Julia Almeida ◽  
Juan Flores-Montero ◽  
Quentin Lécrevisse ◽  
Valentina Guerri ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 906-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana Barrena ◽  
Julia Almeida ◽  
María Del Carmen García-Macias ◽  
Antonio López ◽  
Ana Rasillo ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Immacolata Cozzolino ◽  
Monia Rocco ◽  
Giancarlo Villani ◽  
Marco Picardi

In the last decades, lymph node fine-needle cytology (FNC), coupled with flow cytometry (FC), has gained a role in the diagnosis and classification of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The combination of FNC/FC allows the diagnosis and classification of NHL in lymph node samples with a high sensitivity and specificity by combining cytological features and specific phenotypic profiles. The present review provides a brief technical description of FC and a detailed analysis of the current markers and their combinations (diagnostic algorithm) for the diagnosis and classification of NHL. The basic principles of clonality assessment, as well as the diagnostic strengths and weaknesses of the procedure, are reported. The current diagnostic algorithms for NHL classification are critically reviewed with a focus on specific problems related to single entities. Moreover, this review provides a detailed analysis of the different clinical contexts in which FNC/FC is performed and related implications. Future and further applications of FNC/FC for NHL are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document