Cochrane Review: Pacifier use versus no pacifier use in breastfeeding term infants for increasing duration of breastfeeding

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 1157-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharifah Halimah Jaafar ◽  
Shayesteh Jahanfar ◽  
Mubashir Angolkar ◽  
Jacqueline J Ho
Author(s):  
Sharifah Halimah Jaafar ◽  
Shayesteh Jahanfar ◽  
Mubashir Angolkar ◽  
Jacqueline J Ho

Author(s):  
Halimah Sharifah ◽  
Mubashir Angolkar ◽  
Shayesteh Jahanfar ◽  
Jacqueline J Ho

Author(s):  
Sharifah Halimah Jaafar ◽  
Shayesteh Jahanfar ◽  
Mubashir Angolkar ◽  
Jacqueline J Ho

2019 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christyann L.C. Batista ◽  
Vandilson P. Rodrigues ◽  
Valdinar S. Ribeiro ◽  
Maria D.S.B. Nascimento

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edson Theodoro dos Santos Neto ◽  
Adauto Emmerich Oliveira ◽  
Eliana Zandonade ◽  
Maria del Carmem Bisi Molina

This systematic review of literature proposes to establish whether pacifier use is a risk factor for a reduction in the duration of breastfeeding. A search of the Medline and Lilacs databases was carried out for articles published between 1996 and 2006 using the following descriptors: "breastfeeding" and "pacifier". Articles were excluded if they: had no open access abstracts; did not contain estimators testing the degree of association between breastfeeding duration and pacifier use; involved a follow-up loss of greater than 20%; were written in languages other than Portuguese, English and Spanish; covered specific population categories, such as pre-term babies or mothers who experienced difficulty breastfeeding; or were based on information provided by the mother or a health care professional. Nineteen articles were chosen according to the criteria outlined above; of these, one was a randomized clinical trial, eleven were prospective cohort studies and seven were cross sectional studies. The review concludes that pacifier use is a risk factor for breastfeeding duration, although the performance mechanism remains obscure. Other risk factors relate to the children, their parents and the hospital care they receive regarding the early interruption of breastfeeding. There is a need to standardize the methodology for investigating the association between pacifier use and breastfeeding duration, in order to provide scientific knowledge on this subject.


2017 ◽  
Vol 71 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 203-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura M. Breij ◽  
Marieke Abrahamse-Berkeveld ◽  
Dennis Acton ◽  
Emanuella De Lucia Rolfe ◽  
Ken K. Ong ◽  
...  

Background: Accelerated gain in fat mass in the first months of life is considered to be a risk factor for adult diseases, given the tracking of infancy fat mass into adulthood. Our objective was to assess the influence of early growth, type of feeding and maternal variables on fat mass in early life. Methods: In 300 healthy term infants, we longitudinally measured fat mass percentage (FM%) by air-displacement-plethysmography at 1, 3, and 6 months and abdominal visceral and subcutaneous fat measured by ultrasound at 3 and 6 months. Results: Both gain in FM% and weight-for-length in the first 3 months were positively associated with FM% at 6 months of age and visceral fat at 3 months of age. Gain in FM% and weight-for-length between 3 and 6 months were both positively associated with visceral fat at 6 months. Breastfeeding duration associated positively with subcutaneous fat but not with visceral fat at 3 and 6 months. Maternal characteristics did not associate with FM% or visceral fat at 3 or 6 months. Conclusion: Higher gain in FM% or in weight-for-length in the first postnatal months leads not only to higher FM% but also more to accumulation of visceral fat. Exclusive breastfeeding appears to promote subcutaneous but not visceral fat in the first 6 months.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document