Dyadic analysis of adolescent friendships behaviours during pain: Comparison of those with chronic pain versus those without chronic pain

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Forgeron ◽  
C. Chambers ◽  
B. D. Dick ◽  
J. Cohen ◽  
G. A. Finley ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 648-648
Author(s):  
Karen Lyons

Abstract Drawing on the Theory of Dyadic Illness Management, the study examined the roles of communication, collaborative decision-making and social support on the mental health of 177 couples living with chronic pain. Couples ranged in age from 26-81 years of age; mean age for partner with chronic pain = 55.01 (SD=11.53) and partner without chronic pain = 57.45 (SD=12.50). Using multilevel modeling and controlling for pain severity, pain interference, time since diagnosis, age, shared activities and relationship quality, communication and collaborative decision-making played significant roles in predicting mental health of both members of the couple. Comparative dyadic analysis showed that couples with optimal dyadic mental health had significantly better communication, less concealment, greater collaboration and greater levels of support than couples with poor or incongruent dyadic mental health. Discussion will center on the roles of collaborative illness management behaviors in optimizing dyadic mental health in the context of chronic illness. Part of a symposium sponsored by Dyadic Research on Health and Illness Across the Adult Lifespan Interest Group.


2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 834-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Plesh ◽  
D. Curtis ◽  
J. Levine ◽  
W. D. Mccall Jr

Ob Gyn News ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
SHERRY BOSCHERT
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (13) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
COLIN NELSON
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (19) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
ROXANNE NELSON
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid von Bueren Jarchow ◽  
Bogdan P. Radanov ◽  
Lutz Jäncke

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to examine to what extent chronic pain has an impact on various attentional processes. To measure these attention processes a set of experimental standard tests of the “Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung” (TAP), a neuropsychological battery testing different levels of attention, were used: alertness, divided attention, covert attention, vigilance, visual search, and Go-NoGo tasks. 24 chronic outpatients and 24 well-matched healthy control subjects were tested. The control subjects were matched for age, gender, and education. The group of chronic pain patients exhibited marked deficiencies in all attentional functions except for the divided attention task. Thus, the data supports the notion that chronic pain negatively influences attention because pain patients` attention is strongly captivated by the internal pain stimuli. Only the more demanding divided attention task has the capability to distract the focus of attention to the pain stimuli. Therefore, the pain patients are capable of performing within normal limits. Based on these findings chronic pain patients' attentional deficits should be appropriately evaluated and considered for insurance and work related matters. The effect of a successful distraction away from the pain in the divided attention task can also open new therapeutic aspects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document