Amitriptyline treatment of chronic pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders

2000 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 834-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Plesh ◽  
D. Curtis ◽  
J. Levine ◽  
W. D. Mccall Jr
Author(s):  
Angelika Rauch ◽  
Sebastian Hahnel ◽  
Anita Kloss-Brandstätter ◽  
Oliver Schierz

Abstract Objectives The objective was to describe the physical and psychosocial features of patients attending a specialized consultation hour for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). This investigation focused on those patients who did not receive a diagnosis according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). Materials and methods From 2004 to 2017, patients seeking care during a TMD-specialized consultation hour were consecutively recruited. Each patient completed a TMD-related questionnaire, psychosocial questionnaires (Graded Chronic Pain Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beschwerden-Liste), and the Oral Health Impact Profile-49. The clinical examination was performed according to the RDC/TMD. Results The mean age of the 1020 patients was 43.3 years (75.3% female). According to the RDC/TMD decision trees, 351 patients were categorized without a TMD diagnosis (NoTMDdx). The most frequent reasons for seeking care were orofacial pain/TMJ pain or headaches revealing an OR of 1.89 (for TMDdx group). A relevant proportion of patients was categorized as positive for anxiety (NoTMDdx/TMDdx 30.8/41.2%; p = 0.072), depression (20.8/23.9%; p = 0.433), non-specific physical symptoms (31.4/44.1%; p < 0.001), or dysfunctional chronic pain (11.5/18.2%; p < 0.001). In both patient groups, the oral health-related quality of life was impaired (42.9/52.7 points; p < 0.001), and the frequency of therapy measures prior to the consultation hour was high. Conclusions Patients seeking care from TMD specialists were usually referred with TMD-associated symptoms. Of those, a relevant proportion did not receive a diagnosis according to RDC/TMD decision trees. Clinical relevance Psychosocial screening and the avoidance of overtreatment are recommended for patients with TMD-related symptoms.


CRANIO® ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milica Jeremic-Knezevic ◽  
Aleksandar Knezevic ◽  
Nikola Boban ◽  
Daniela Djurovic Koprivica ◽  
Jasmina Boban

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. e543-e549 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Santana-Mora ◽  
J. Cudeiro ◽  
M.J. Mora-Bermúdez ◽  
B. Rilo-Pousa ◽  
J.C. Ferreira-Pinho ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bethea A. Kleykamp ◽  
McKenzie C. Ferguson ◽  
Ewan McNicol ◽  
Ida Bixho ◽  
Lesley M. Arnold ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-6
Author(s):  
Ira Tanti ◽  
Vivi Vidya Waty Wira ◽  
Yenni Pragustine ◽  
Laura Susanti Himawan ◽  
Nina Ariani

BACKGROUND Pain associated with oral problems is one of the most frequent chronic pain of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). This study was conducted to analyze the psychometric properties of the Indonesian version of the graded chronic pain scale 2.0 (GCPS-ID) in Indonesian patients with TMDs. METHODS The English version of the GCPS version 2.0 was translated and back-translated according to international guidelines. This study conducted from June to December 2016 at the Dental Hospital, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Indonesia, and the participants were 202 TMDs patients who had never undergone temporomandibular joint surgery or suffered facial pain for more than 6 months. The evaluation of the GCPS-ID included the internal consistency test, test-retest reliability, and construct validity tests. RESULTS The GCPS-ID had a high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.896). The intraclass correlation coefficient of the pain intensity and the disability score were 0.789 and 0.706, respectively. The convergent validity demonstrated a moderately positive correlation between the GCPS-ID and the Indonesian version of oral health impact profile for TMD for pain (r = 0.595; p<0.001) and disability (r = 0.488; p<0.001). The discriminant validity between GCPS-ID and the subjective patient’s quality of life revealed a weak positive correlation (r = 0.195; p = 0.191). CONCLUSIONS GCPS-ID is a reliable and valid assessment tool for evaluating TMD pain in Indonesia.


Pain Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3260-3262
Author(s):  
Alberto Herrero Babiloni ◽  
Fernando G Exposto ◽  
Yasmine Bouferguene ◽  
Yuri Costa ◽  
Gilles J Lavigne ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 56-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria Edefonti ◽  
Francesca Bravi ◽  
Iacopo Cioffi ◽  
Riccardo Capuozzo ◽  
Lucia Ammendola ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
David K Lam ◽  
Barry J Sessle ◽  
Brian E Cairns ◽  
James W Hu

The purpose of the present review is to correlate recent knowledge of the role of peripheral ionotropic glutamate receptors in the temporomandibular joint and muscle pain from animal and human experimental pain models with findings in patients. Chronic pain is common, and many people suffer from chronic pain conditions involving deep craniofacial tissues such as temporomandibular disorders or fibromyalgia. Animal and human studies have indicated that the activation of peripheral ionotropic glutamate receptors in deep craniofacial tissues may contribute to muscle and temporomandibular joint pain and that sex differences in the activation of glutamate receptors may be involved in the female predominance in temporomandibular disorders and fibromyalgia. A peripheral mechanism involving autocrine and/or paracrine regulation of nociceptive neuronal excitability via injury or inflammation-induced release of glutamate into peripheral tissues that may contribute to the development of craniofacial pain is proposed.


Revista Dor ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luci Mara França Correia ◽  
Wagner Hummig ◽  
Taísa Adamowicz ◽  
Daniel Benzecry de Almeida

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document