scholarly journals DNA methylation profiling reveals a predominant immune component in breast cancers

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. 726-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Dedeurwaerder ◽  
Christine Desmedt ◽  
Emilie Calonne ◽  
Sandeep K. Singhal ◽  
Benjamin Haibe‐Kains ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Jurmeister ◽  
Karsten Weber ◽  
Sonia Villegas ◽  
Thomas Karn ◽  
Michael Untch ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Current clinical guidelines suggest that breast cancers with low hormone receptor expression (LowHR) in 1–10% of tumor cells should be regarded as hormone receptor positive. However, clinical data show that these patients have worse outcome compared to patients with hormone receptor expression above 10%. We performed DNA methylation profiling on 23 LowHR breast cancer specimens, including 13 samples with HER2 amplification and compared our results with a reference breast cancer cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas to clarify the status for this infrequent but important patient subgroup. Results In unsupervised clustering and dimensionality reduction, breast cancers with low hormone receptor expression that lacked HER2 amplification usually clustered with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) reference samples (8/10; “LowHR TNBC-like”). In contrast, most specimens with low hormone receptor expression and HER2 amplification grouped with hormone receptor positive cancers (11/13; “LowHR HRpos-like”). We observed highly similar DNA methylation patterns of LowHR TNBC-like samples and true TNBCs. Furthermore, the Ki67 proliferation index of LowHR TNBC-like samples and clinical outcome parameters were more similar to TNBCs and differed from LowHR HRpos-like cases. Conclusions We here demonstrate that LowHR breast cancer comprises two epigenetically distinct groups. Our data strongly suggest that LowHR TNBC-like samples are molecularly, histologically and clinically closely related to TNBC, while LowHR HRpos-like specimens are closely related to hormone receptor positive tumors.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Naue ◽  
Huub C.J. Hoefsloot ◽  
Ate D. Kloosterman ◽  
Pernette J. Verschure

2016 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 555-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricky S. Joshi ◽  
Paras Garg ◽  
Noah Zaitlen ◽  
Tuuli Lappalainen ◽  
Corey T. Watson ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicklas H. Staunstrup ◽  
Anna Starnawska ◽  
Mette Nyegaard ◽  
Lene Christiansen ◽  
Anders L. Nielsen ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. S122-S123
Author(s):  
Masaomi Kawai ◽  
Makoto Shibutani ◽  
U. Mami ◽  
Miwa Takahashi ◽  
Yasuaki Dewa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi5-vi5
Author(s):  
Wies Vallentgoed ◽  
Anneke Niers ◽  
Karin van Garderen ◽  
Martin van den Bent ◽  
Kaspar Draaisma ◽  
...  

Abstract The GLASS-NL consortium, was initiated to gain insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying glioma evolution and to identify markers of progression in IDH-mutant astrocytomas. Here, we present the first results of genome-wide DNA-methylation profiling of GLASS-NL samples. 110 adult patients were identified with an IDH-mutant astrocytoma at first diagnosis. All patients underwent a surgical resection of the tumor at least twice, separated by at least 6 months (median 40.9 months (IQR: 24.0, 64.7). In 37% and 18% of the cases, patients were treated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy respectively, before surgical resection of the recurrent tumor. DNA-methylation profiling was done on 235 samples from 103 patients (102 1st, 101 2nd, 29 3rd, and 3 4th resection). Copy number variations were also extracted from these data. Methylation classes were determined according to Capper et al. Overall survival (OS) was measured from date of first surgery. Of all primary tumors, the methylation-classifier assigned 85 (87%) to the low grade subclass and 10 (10%) to the high grade subclass. The relative proportion of high grade tumors increased ~three-fold at tumor recurrence (32/101, 32%) and even further in the second recurrence (15/29, 52%). Methylation classes were prognostic, both in primary and recurrent tumors. The overall DNA-methylation levels of recurrent samples was lower than that of primary samples. This difference is explained by the increased number of high grade samples at recurrence, since near identical DNA-methylation levels were observed in samples that remained low grade. In an unsupervised analysis, DNA-methylation data derived from primary and first recurrence samples of individual patients mostly (79%) cluster together. Recurrent samples that do not cluster with their primary tumor, form a separate group with relatively low genome-wide DNA-methylation. Our data demonstrate that methylation profiling identifies a shift towards a higher grade at tumor progression coinciding with reduced genome-wide DNA-methylation levels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document