The influence of organic pollutant load and external resistance on the performance of a solid phase microbial fuel cell fed orange peel wastes

Author(s):  
Mhamed Hariti ◽  
Radia Chemlal ◽  
Madani Drouiche ◽  
Nabil Mameri
2021 ◽  
Vol 261 ◽  
pp. 04037
Author(s):  
Nannan Zhao

To investigate the removal effect of pollutants in mariculture sediment by sediment microbial fuel cell (SMFC) and its power generation capacity, the effects of external resistance, cathode pH and cathode dissolved oxygen concentration (DO) on the SMFC system were investigated. The results showed that the optimal parameters for SMFC were as follows: external resistance = 1500 Ω, pH = 8.5 and DO = 5 mg·L-1. In these situations, the power generation performance and organic degradation effect were both the best. The maximum output voltages were 585, 606, and 587 mV, respectively; the removal rates of COD in sediment were 75.51%, 84.21% and 86.63%, respectively; and the removal rates of ammonia nitrogen in sediment were 80.34%, 98.91% and 90.24%, respectively. The SMFC system had a certain degradation ability to pollutants such as COD and ammonia nitrogen in the sediment of the marine aquaculture areas, which had a broad application prospect.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 16765-16771
Author(s):  
Ting Mei ◽  
Chang Cong ◽  
Qiong Huang ◽  
Tian-shun Song ◽  
Jingjing Xie

2013 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 250-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Tao Li ◽  
Shao-Hui Zhang ◽  
Yu-Mei Hua

The effects of pH, chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration and external resistance on denitrifying microbial fuel cell were evaluated in terms of electricity generation characteristics and pollutant removal performance. The results showed that anodic influent with weakly alkaline or neutral pH and cathodic influent with weakly acidic pH favored pollutant removal and electricity generation. The suitable influent pH of the anode and cathode were found to be 7.5–8.0 and 6.0–6.5, respectively. In the presence of sufficient nitrate in the cathode, higher influent COD concentration led to more electricity generation and greater pollutant removal rates. With an anodic influent pH of 8.0 and a cathodic influent pH of 6.0, an influent COD concentration of 400 mg/L was deemed to be appropriate. Low external resistance favored nitrate and COD removal. The results suggest that operation of denitrifying microbial fuel cell at a lower external resistance would be desirable for pollutant removal but not electricity generation.


2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (25) ◽  
pp. 11124-11130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin-Tsan Wang ◽  
Fan-Ying Liao ◽  
Kong-Sheng Liu

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 1571-1578 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.P. Pinto ◽  
B. Srinivasan ◽  
S.R. Guiot ◽  
B. Tartakovsky

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Bustami Ibrahim ◽  
Uju Uju ◽  
Alvindo Chrisna Mukti

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a bioreactor utilizing bacteria as electrocatalysts to convert bioenergy from biomass into electrical energy. The aim of this research were to determine the effects of the electrode distance on the bacterial density and the electrical value generated by the MFC as well as to evaluate the ability of MFC in reducing the pollutant. Single chamber MFC system with various electrode distances including 2 cm, 4 cm, and 6 cm were assembled. The wastewater of fish pindang processing was used as the medium<br />for the MFC. The results showed that the distance had no effect on the biofilm density of the electrode and the reduction of the wastewater pollutant load. However, the distance affected the electrical value of the<br />MFC. Biofilm density on the MFC electrode after 120 hours was 0.65-6.46 CFU/ cm2. The highest voltage was obtained from the 6 cm electrode distance with the voltage 0.38±0.01 V. Positive correlation (R2 = 0.99)<br />between microbial density and electricity produced at the cathode was observed, but weak at the anoda (R2 = 0.47). The MFC system could decrease the BOD value up to 50.78% and COD up to 33.29%, however the TAN value was increased to 6 mg/L.


2010 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delina Y. Lyon ◽  
Francois Buret ◽  
Timothy M. Vogel ◽  
Jean-Michel Monier

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document