Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of controlled steel moment-resisting frame structures

2002 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 2049-2066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana R. Barroso ◽  
Steven Winterstein
2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lan Lin ◽  
Nove Naumoski ◽  
Murat Saatcioglu ◽  
Simon Foo

This is the second of two companion papers on improved intensity measures of strong seismic ground motions for use in probabilistic seismic demand analysis of reinforced concrete frame buildings. The first paper discusses the development of improved intensity measures. This paper describes the application of the developed intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand analysis. The application is illustrated on the three reinforced concrete frame buildings (4, 10, and 16-storey high) that were used in the first paper. This involved computations of the seismic responses of the structures and the seismic hazard using the improved intensity measures. The response and the hazard results were then combined by means of probabilistic seismic demand analysis to determine the mean annual frequencies of exceeding specified response levels due to future earthquakes (i.e., the probabilistic seismic demands). For the purpose of comparison, probabilistic seismic demand analyses were also conducted by employing the spectral acceleration at the fundamental structural periods (Sa(T1)) as an intensity measure, which is currently the most used in practice. It was found that the use of the improved intensity measures results in significantly lower seismic demands relative to those corresponding to the intensity measure represented by Sa(T1), especially for long period structures.


Author(s):  
Stefano Caprinozzi ◽  
Mohammad M. Ahmed ◽  
Fabrizio Paolacci ◽  
Oreste S. Bursi ◽  
Vincenzo La Salandra

Piping systems of energy industries in oil & gas play a critical role in meeting the increasing global energy demand. A great portion of these pipelines is located in high seismic-prone areas. Such systems have been found to be quite vulnerable to seismic events. Current seismic design approaches to piping systems are mainly based on the allowable stress method, even though more modern design methods are currently available for buildings or nuclear power plants; for example, the Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering (PBEE) framework has not been applied yet to piping systems and relevant structures. In this respect, both information about the quantification of limit states for pipes and adequate non-linear structural models for seismic analysis of piping systems and relevant structures are very limited. One of the key ingredients of PBEE approach for the assessment of the seismic vulnerability of existing structures is the evaluation of fragility curves, namely the probability of exceeding a certain level of damage for a given seismic intensity measure (IM). However, the contributions in the literature on this delicate aspect are very limited. This paper deals with such a problem by using a very popular method, namely the Cloud Analysis, originally developed as a method for probabilistic seismic demand analysis of civil structures. This method is here applied to a typical piping system for process plants. For this purpose, the structure is properly modelled, especially support structure and pipe, including pipe fittings like elbows and bolted flange joints. Using natural accelerograms selected from the PEER database and in accordance with given hazard conditions, the probabilistic seismic demand analysis is performed adopting different engineering demand parameters (EDP) consistent with the damage states expected in the pipes and fittings and in the support structure. According to the results of experimental tests campaign performed in the past by some of the authors on flanged joints, and elbows, different damage states (leakage, yielding, rupture) have been identified and related to the corresponding EDP and the corresponding probability of exceeding has been determined by assuming a lognormal distribution of the response. The analysis intends to recognise the most probable damage condition in a refinery piping system subjected to a seismic input.


2018 ◽  
Vol 763 ◽  
pp. 557-565
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Tagawa ◽  
Gregory A. MacRae

Building structures around the world have been designed using various framing methods. In Japan, the two-way moment-resisting frame structure, which is designed as a 3D seismic frame with beams connected to the columns, with moment connections in both directions, is traditionally constructed. In contrast, in the United States and many other countries in high seismic regions, the one-way moment-resisting frame structure, which is designed as separate seismic and gravity frame structure with only a few expensive moment connections in seismic frames, is typically constructed. Structures with these different framing systems are likely to exhibit different seismic response and collapse mechanism when subjected to large earthquake excitation. However, the simulation up to complete collapse has almost not been conducted and safety margin to complete collapse of these different framing systems has not been sufficiently understood. In this study, seismic simulation of U.S. and Japanese type three-story steel moment-resisting frame structures is conducted using general-purpose finite element analysis program. Practical macro models used for the simulation are based on beam and shell elements. It is found that composite effects of floor slab accelerate column yielding in both U.S. and Japanese type steel frame structures and drift concentration may occur at relatively small ground motion level and eventually result in complete collapse.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document