Farm to School Institute Grant (USDA)

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (14) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Cates ◽  
Liz Livingston Howard

This case series describes the startup of Farm to School of Park County, an emerging nonprofit organization in the US state of Montana. Case (A) describes the community, the need, and the origins of Farm to School in Livingston, Montana. The leaders of Farm to School face a budget crisis and need to evaluate four options to decide whether, when, and how it should become an independent organization. As Case (B) begins, Farm to School has decided to enter into a fiscal sponsorship agreement with the local community foundation. The next task for the organization's leaders is recruiting founding board members. They need to decide whom to ask and how to do it. In Case (C), the board develops a strategic plan and establishes committees. However, the board members and leaders start to feel fatigue in the face of the demands of a startup organization, leading to questions about what is truly strategic and how work will get done. The Farm to School organization in Case (D) has just issued its first annual report, filled with meaningful accomplishments. The leaders of the organization begin to plan to build an organization that will outlast them and the founding board members.


2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainbow A. Vogt ◽  
Lucia L. Kaiser ◽  
Robert B. Rucker

Author(s):  
Estevan Leopoldo de Freitas Coca ◽  
Ricardo César Barbosa Júnior

This chapter identifies school meal programs in Brazil and Canada as sustainable alternatives to some of the harms caused by the dominance large corporations exert on the global food system. It analyses the new version of the Brazilian National School Meal Program (PNAE) and British Columbia’s Farm to School initiative (F2S BC) in Canada. On one hand, PNAE creates an institutional market for family farmers, while offering students a greater amount of locally produced fresh and healthy food. On the other, F2S BC takes form through activities such as school gardens, food education and incentives to purchase locally produced food. This work finds that PNAE has more reach but limits school meals to consumption, whereas F2S BC emphasizes the role of schools as spaces for growing and recognises food as a pedagogical resource.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 794-808
Author(s):  
Marie Barnard ◽  
Georgianna Mann ◽  
Eleanor Green ◽  
Emma Tkachuck ◽  
Kathy Knight

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document