scholarly journals X-Chromosome Genetic Association Test Accounting for X-Inactivation, Skewed X-Inactivation, and Escape from X-Inactivation

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 483-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Wang ◽  
Robert Yu ◽  
Sanjay Shete
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Bei-Qi Wang ◽  
Guojun Liu-Fu ◽  
Wing Kam Fung ◽  
Ji-Yuan Zhou

2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost Gribnau ◽  
Sandra Luikenhuis ◽  
Konrad Hochedlinger ◽  
Kim Monkhorst ◽  
Rudolf Jaenisch

In mammals, dosage compensation is achieved by X chromosome inactivation in female cells. Xist is required and sufficient for X inactivation, and Xist gene deletions result in completely skewed X inactivation. In this work, we analyzed skewing of X inactivation in mice with an Xist deletion encompassing sequence 5 KB upstream of the promoter through exon 3. We found that this mutation results in primary nonrandom X inactivation in which the wild-type X chromosome is always chosen for inactivation. To understand the molecular mechanisms that affect choice, we analyzed the role of replication timing in X inactivation choice. We found that the two Xist alleles and all regions tested on the X chromosome replicate asynchronously before the start of X inactivation. However, analysis of replication timing in cell lines with skewed X inactivation showed no preference for one of the two Xist alleles to replicate early in S-phase before the onset of X inactivation, indicating that asynchronous replication timing does not play a role in skewing of X inactivation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1733) ◽  
pp. 20160355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Carrel ◽  
Carolyn J. Brown

A tribute to Mary Lyon was held in October 2016. Many remarked about Lyon's foresight regarding many intricacies of the X-chromosome inactivation process. One such example is that a year after her original 1961 hypothesis she proposed that genes with Y homologues should escape from X inactivation to achieve dosage compensation between males and females. Fifty-five years later we have learned many details about these escapees that we attempt to summarize in this review, with a particular focus on recent findings. We now know that escapees are not rare, particularly on the human X, and that most lack functionally equivalent Y homologues, leading to their increasingly recognized role in sexually dimorphic traits. Newer sequencing technologies have expanded profiling of primary tissues that will better enable connections to sex-biased disorders as well as provide additional insights into the X-inactivation process. Chromosome organization, nuclear location and chromatin environments distinguish escapees from other X-inactivated genes. Nevertheless, several big questions remain, including what dictates their distinct epigenetic environment, the underlying basis of species differences in escapee regulation, how different classes of escapees are distinguished, and the roles that local sequences and chromosome ultrastructure play in escapee regulation. This article is part of the themed issue ‘X-chromosome inactivation: a tribute to Mary Lyon’.


Genomics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
pp. 1152-1159
Author(s):  
Zhongxue Chen ◽  
Qingzhong Liu ◽  
Kai Wang

Author(s):  
Wenxiu Ma ◽  
Giancarlo Bonora ◽  
Joel B. Berletch ◽  
Xinxian Deng ◽  
William S. Noble ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-Yu Guo ◽  
Kathryn L. Lunetta ◽  
Anita L. DeStefano, ◽  
L. Adrienne Cupples

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e0138223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjia Wang ◽  
Jonas Mandel ◽  
Jan Bouaziz ◽  
Daniel Commenges ◽  
Serguei Nabirotchkine ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document