scholarly journals Brief Assessment of Impaired Cognition (BASIC)—Validation of a new dementia case‐finding instrument integrating cognitive assessment with patient and informant report

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 1724-1733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasper Jørgensen ◽  
T. Rune Nielsen ◽  
Ann Nielsen ◽  
Frans Boch Waldorff ◽  
Peter Høgh ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasper Jørgensen ◽  
T. Rune Nielsen ◽  
Ann Nielsen ◽  
Frans Boch Waldorff ◽  
Peter Høgh ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qun Lin Chan ◽  
Xin Xu ◽  
Muhammad Amin Shaik ◽  
Steven Shih Tsze Chong ◽  
Richard Jor Yeong Hui ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e020521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Marie Burn ◽  
Jane Fleming ◽  
Carol Brayne ◽  
Chris Fox ◽  
Frances Bunn

ObjectivesIn 2012–2013, the English National Health Service mandated hospitals to conduct systematic case-finding of people with dementia among older people with unplanned admissions. The method was not defined. The aim of this study was to understand current approaches to dementia case-finding in acute hospitals in England and explore the views of healthcare professionals on perceived benefits and challenges.DesignQualitative study involving interviews, focus groups and thematic content analysis.SettingPrimary care and secondary care across six counties in the East of England.ParticipantsHospital staff involved in dementia case-finding and primary care staff in the catchment areas of those hospitals.ResultsWe recruited 23 hospital staff and 36 primary care staff, including 30 general practitioners (GPs). Analysis resulted in three themes: (1) lack of consistent approaches in case-finding processes, (2) barriers between primary care and secondary care which impact on case-finding outcomes and (3) perceptions of rationale, aims and impacts of case-finding. The study shows that there were variations in how well hospitals recorded and reported outcomes to GPs. Barriers between primary care and secondary care, including GPs’ lack of access to hospital investigations and lack of clarity about roles and responsibilities, impacted case-finding outcomes. Staff in secondary care were more positive about the initiative than primary care staff, and there were conflicting priorities for primary care and secondary care regarding case-finding.ConclusionsThe study suggests a more evidence-based approach was needed to justify approaches to dementia case-finding. Information communicated to primary care from hospitals needs to be comprehensive, appropriate and consistent before GPs can effectively plan further investigation, treatment or care. Follow-up in primary care further requires access to options for postdiagnostic support. There is a need to evaluate the outcomes for patients and the economic impact on health and care services across settings.


2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 344-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Bell ◽  
Kirsty Harkness ◽  
J. M. Dickson ◽  
Daniel Blackburn
Keyword(s):  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e026927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Marie Burn ◽  
Frances Bunn ◽  
Jane Fleming ◽  
David Turner ◽  
Chris Fox ◽  
...  

ObjectiveBetween 2012 and 2017 dementia case finding was routinely carried out on people aged 75 years and over with unplanned admissions to acute hospitals across England. The assumption was that this would lead to better planning of care and treatment for patients with dementia following discharge from hospital. However, little is known about the experiences of patients and carers or the impacts on other health services. This study explored the impact of dementia case finding on older people and their families and on their use of services.DesignThematic content analysis was conducted on qualitative interview data and costs associated with service use were estimated. Measures included the Mini-Mental State Examination, the EuroQol quality of life scale and a modified Client Service Receipt Inventory.SettingFour counties in the East of England.ParticipantsPeople aged ≥75 years who had been identified by case finding during an unplanned hospital admission as warranting further investigation of possible dementia and their family carers.ResultsWe carried out 28 interviews, including 19 joint patient-carer(s), 5 patient only and 4 family carer interviews. Most patients and carers were unaware that memory assessments had taken place, with many families not being informed or involved in the process. Participants had a variety of views on memory testing in hospital and had concerns about how hospitals carried out assessments and communicated results. Overall, case finding did not lead to general practitioner (GP) follow-up after discharge home or lead to referral for further investigation. Few services were initiated because of dementia case finding in hospital.ConclusionsThis study shows that dementia case finding may not lead to increased GP follow-up or service provision for patients after discharge from hospital. There is a need for a more evidence-based approach to the initiation of mandatory initiatives such as case finding that inevitably consume stretched human and financial resources.


2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (7S_Part_15) ◽  
pp. P790-P791
Author(s):  
Donald R. Royall ◽  
Ram J. Bishnoi ◽  
Raymond F. Palmer ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document