Views of healthcare professionals on recruiting to a psychosocial randomised controlled trial: a qualitative study

Background Randomised controlled trials, and in particular those of psychosocial interventions, often fail to recruit to target, resulting in underpowered trials with poor generalisability of findings. The objectives of this study were to explore the views of healthcare professionals on recruiting to psychosocial research studies, and to explore their views on factors that may hinder or facilitate recruitment. Methods We conducted 14 semi-structured interviews, with healthcare professionals who had been involved in recruitment into a randomised controlled trial of a talking therapy for depression in patients with advanced cancer. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Results Five primary themes were identified, comprised of 11 subthemes. Attitudes towards research were largely positive. Health care professionals identified lack of time and narrow screening criteria as barriers to recruitment, and also noted the tendency to withhold participants from research for reasons other than eligibility (e.g., gatekeeping). The engagement of the study team with the clinical recruitment site, and the frequent presence of a researcher in clinics, were noted as facilitating recruitment. Conclusions Healthcare professionals involved in recruiting to trials of psychosocial interventions hold generally positive views of psychosocial research. However, they report that constraints including space and time limit their ability to recruit, and express anxieties about approaching patients for trial recruitment in the palliative phase of their illness. The findings from this study can inform how best to design trials, and in particular trials of psychosocial interventions, and train health care professionals for the study, to maximise recruitment.

Exploration of the views of healthcare professionals working in a mental health trust in England on pharmacists as future approved clinicians: early findings

Introduction The 2007 amendment to the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1983 enabled various non-medical professionals to now qualify as approved clinicians (ACs); these included social workers, mental health and learning disability nurses, clinical psychologists and occupational therapists. [1–2] As ACs, these professionals can take on roles of clinical leadership whilst assuming responsibility for patients under the Act. Although mental health pharmacists have recognised specialist clinical roles and regularly work alongside these professionals in caring for patients, they are not presently permitted to practise as ACs. Aim This study sets out to investigate the views of healthcare professionals working in a mental health trust in England on this hitherto unexplored group of the mental health workforce as potential ACs. Methods Upon obtaining ethics approval, pharmacists, ACs and other experienced mental health professionals working in one mental health trust in England were approached via internal trust email to take part in a digitally audio recorded semi-structured interview to explore their views on pharmacists as potential ACs in future. A thematic analysis is being performed on the entire set of transcripts and an additional sentiment analysis will be applied to specific parts of the dataset. Results A total of 11 interviews were completed with 6 pharmacists, 4 medical ACs and 1 ‘other’ mental health professional thus far, with recruitment ongoing. Emerging themes included wide recognition among participants of highly valued key skills of pharmacists within mental health services provision, for instance their ability to access and appraise specialist literature as well as their analytical skills to apply expert knowledge to real-life cases. Participants identified unique challenges to pharmacists potentially becoming ACs in future, namely the traditional organisational structures whereby pharmacists are line managed and clinically supervised from within a pharmacy department which sits external to the clinical teams they typically work in, and the lack of pharmacists being fully embedded in interdisciplinary teams. Conclusion Since this is the first study of its kind to be conducted on a small cohort of participants working within one mental health trust in England, this qualitative study will likely highlight the need for further research to be carried out on the topic, such as data collection in several other NHS trusts as well as recruiting participants from the working group and other stakeholders involved in the most recent amendment of the Act. Whilst data collection and analysis are ongoing, initial findings help shed light on potential barriers and also possible solutions to these, as well as other opportunities for pharmacists wishing to assume higher leadership roles within mental health services in England. References 1. Barcham, C. Understanding The Mental Health Act Changes – Challenges And Opportunities For Doctors. BJMP. 2008;1 (2):13–17. 2. Oates, J., Brandon, T., Burrell, C., Ebrahim, S., Taylor, J. & Veitch, P. Non-medical approved clinicians: Results of a first national survey in England and Wales. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 2018;60:51–56.

Disability, sexual and reproductive health: a scoping review of healthcare professionals’ views on their confidence and competence in care provision

BackgroundThe sexual and reproductive needs of people with disabilities are often unmet. Healthcare professionals play an important role in meeting these needs.ObjectiveTo explore the views of healthcare professionals on their confidence and competence in providing sexual and reproductive healthcare to people with disabilities.MethodologyTwo databases were searched yielding 14 studies included in the review. Studies detailing healthcare professionals’ experiences working in the subject area were included alongside results and evaluations of staff training/workshops within the area. Search results were screened for eligibility by the first and second authors and any discrepancies were resolved by the third author. All subsequent stages were carried out by the first author and reviewed by the second and third authors.ResultsThe study's findings indicate that there is a lack of training, guidelines, patient contact, time, teamwork and collaboration between staff, and a lack of awareness/access to resources within this area. Evaluations of training programmes/workshops showed an increase in knowledge, comfort and skills surrounding the subject. Continuous training would be beneficial to ensure these are maintained at a high level.ConclusionsOverall healthcare professionals felt they lack confidence and competence in providing sexual and reproductive healthcare to people with disabilities. Further research in this area is recommended to assess this in more depth. Development of guidelines, multidisciplinary training programmes and further resources for both staff and patients are recommended.