Clinical relevance in drug trials for Alzheimer's disease and related disorders

1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 265-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Spagnoli
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. P808-P808
Author(s):  
Femke Soetewey ◽  
Hanne Struyfs ◽  
Erik Stoops ◽  
Christine Van Broeckhoven ◽  
Hugo Vanderstichele ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
B. Vellas ◽  
P. Aisen ◽  
M. Weiner ◽  
J. Touchon

We are happy to publish the CTAD 2018 abstracts in the present JPAD issue. As you can see many new interesting studies are presented in this issue of the journal: from new drug trials to biomarkers, imaging studies, as well as new clinical outcomes. More specifically, we will have several hot topics presentation on: 1. Major drug trials using bace inhibitors (verubecestat, lanabecestat, atabecestat, elenbecestat…) in the early phase of the disease (APECS early trials…). Both clinical, biomarkers (MRI, CSF, PET) and safety data will be presented. 2. New data on blood biomarkers including a keynote from R. Bateman, and presentations from Araclon and Roche biomarkers. 3. Results from phase III and IIB trials including a novel and multi-targeted oligosaccharide in patients with mild-moderate AD in China; the AMBAR (Alzheimer’s Management By Albumin Replacement) study, the TOMMORROW trial: a trial to delay the onset of MCI due to AD and qualify a genetic biomarker algorithm, the 18-month STEADFAST trial of azeliragon in participants with mild Alzheimer’s Disease; a longitudinal 148-week extension 4. Results 18 from F-AV-1451-A16: a clinicopathological study of the correspondence between flortaucipir PET imaging and post-mortem assessment of tau pathology. 5. Latest developments in anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies including aducanumab nonnegligible, and new results and data analyses of the BAN2401 study 201 in early AD. 6. New developments with safety and efficacy of lemborexant for sleep-wake regulation in patients with irregular sleep-wake rhythm disorders and Alzheimer’s Disease dementia. 7. Advances with the ABBV-8E12, a humanized anti-tau monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of early Alzheimer’s Disease. 8. Endpoints for early Alzheimer’s Disease clinical trials: interpretation and application of the draft FDA guidance. And many others… It is important to underline that a not negligible number of abstracts concern non amyloid targets (eg: Tau-related targets but also targets outside the classical AD cascade).


The Lancet ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 376 (9742) ◽  
pp. 658 ◽  
Author(s):  
The Lancet

2016 ◽  
Vol 208 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith R. Harrison ◽  
Michael J. Owen

SummaryThe pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease is complex. The amyloid hypothesis has directed research efforts for many years, but it has recently been questioned after failed drug trials. Here, we review the evidence for and against and suggest that it might be premature to abandon the amyloid hypothesis.


2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 438-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Vellas ◽  
Maria C. Carrillo ◽  
Cristina Sampaio ◽  
H. Robert Brashear ◽  
Eric Siemers ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 176-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason T. Olin ◽  
Lon S. Schneider ◽  
Rachelle S. Doody ◽  
Christopher M. Clark ◽  
Steven H. Ferris ◽  
...  

It is important that clinicians who rate global change as part of Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical drug trials agree on a relevant set of behaviors and information to be considered in formulating their rating. Yet, consensus among raters has been difficult to establish, and inter-rater reliability of clinical global impression of change (CGIC) ratings has been low. In preparation for the development of a new CGIC scale to be used in AD clinical trials, the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC), we surveyed clinicians at sites comprising the National Institute on Aging-sponsored ADCS participating centers to identify whether or not consensus regarding CGICs exists. Overall, respondents reported that a CGIC should include an assessment of the patient's function and mental status, a care giver interview, and a standardized set of questions, and it should take approximately 20 minutes per interview. Depending on a patient's level of impairment, raters consider different areas of behavior in formulating a CGIC rating. These findings demonstrate the considerable consensus regarding the CGIC rating process, and were integrated into the design of the ADCS-CGIC, currently in use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document