Development, translation, and preliminary validation of the neck dissection assessment tool

Head & Neck ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Yang ◽  
Érika Mercier ◽  
Louis Guertin ◽  
Eric Bissada ◽  
Apostolos Christopoulos ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Ciarrochi ◽  
Steven C. Hayes ◽  
Stefan G. Hofmann

The “protocols for syndromes” approach to evidence-based psychological intervention has failed the test of scientific progressivity. Process-based therapy provides an alternative model that is focused on treatment elements that target biopsychosocial processes of relevance to individual treatment goals. That shift in focus requires new, more integrative and idionomic models that identify key processes of change, using high temporal density measurement applied at the level of the person. Standard measurement validation approaches are inadequate to this challenge. The present study develops and provides a preliminary validation of a process-based assessment tool (PBAT) -- an item pool meant for intensive longitudinal clinical assessment. Developed using the Extended-Evolutionary Meta-Model of PBT and evaluated using an evolutionary algorithm appropriate for the evaluation of individual items, we administered the PBAT online to a representative sample of 598 participants (290 male; 302 female; 6 unidentified. Mage = 32.6). Analyses revealed that the PBAT distinguishes between positive and negative processes, links in theoretically coherent ways to need satisfaction and thwarting, and links to clinically relevant outcomes of sadness, anger, anxiety, stress, lack of social support, vitality, and health. The PBAT provides a beginning step towards developing a process-based tool that allows clinicians and researchers to select individual items or sets of items for individual-focused idionomic research and practice.


Author(s):  
John Unsworth ◽  
Andrew Melling ◽  
Jaden Allan ◽  
Guy Tucker ◽  
Michael Kelleher

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. A508
Author(s):  
P. Giraldo ◽  
A. Lopez ◽  
E. Rios ◽  
I. Gonzalez-Grande ◽  
M. Roset ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 528-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susannah B. F. Paletz ◽  
Meredith M. Hughes ◽  
Arlouwe Sumer ◽  
Claudia M. Brugman ◽  
Michael Bunting

2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 214-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam M. Huber ◽  
Elizabeth M. Dugan ◽  
Peter A. Lachenbruch ◽  
Brian M. Feldman ◽  
Maria D. Perez ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Britton W. Brewer ◽  
Christine M. Caldwell ◽  
Albert J. Petitpas ◽  
Judy L. Van Raalte ◽  
Miquel Pans ◽  
...  

A sport-specific, self-report measure of identity foreclosure was developed through a systematic process that included item pool generation, expert review, administration of items to a development sample of intercollegiate student athletes (N = 326), item evaluation, and administration of scales to validation samples of intercollegiate student athletes (N = 322, N = 54, and N = 64, respectively). The process yielded two four-item scales reflecting commitment to the occupational identity of athlete and one 4-item scale reflecting active exploration of roles other than that of athlete that (a) are internally consistent and temporally stable, (b) demonstrate preliminary factorial and convergent validity, and (c) can be used to create indices of identity foreclosure tailored to the sport context. The resulting Sport-Specific Measure of Identity Foreclosure has potential utility as an assessment tool for research and practice with athletes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document