The APTIMA HPV assayversusthe hybrid capture 2 test in triage of women with ASC-US or LSIL cervical cytology: A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy

Abstract. Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted that included studies from January 2000 to August 2015 using the electronic databases PubMed, Embase and Springer link. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLR), negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) as well as the 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRA for acute PE. Meta-disc software version 1.4 was used to analyze the data. Results: Five studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity (86 %, 95 % CI: 81 % to 90 %) and specificity (99 %, 95 % CI: 98 % to 100 %) demonstrated that MRA diagnosis had limited sensitivity and high specificity in the detection of acute PE. The pooled estimate of PLR (41.64, 95 % CI: 17.97 to 96.48) and NLR (0.17, 95 % CI: 0.11 to 0.27) provided evidence for the low missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis rates of MRA for acute PE. The high diagnostic accuracy of MRA for acute PE was demonstrated by the overall DOR (456.51, 95 % CI: 178.38 - 1168.31) and SROC curves (AUC = 0.9902 ± 0.0061). Conclusions: MRA can be used for the diagnosis of acute PE. However, due to limited sensitivity, MRA cannot be used as a stand-alone test to exclude acute PE.

Download Full-text

Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography (TVS) for non-invasive diagnosis of rectosigmoidal endometriosis – a systematic review and meta-analysis

Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde ◽

10.1055/s-0031-1278538 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 71 (05) ◽

Author(s):

G Hudelist ◽

J English ◽

A Thomas ◽

A Tinelli ◽

C Singer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Transvaginal Sonography ◽

Non Invasive

Download Full-text

The role of serum periostin in the diagnosis of asthma: A meta-analysis

Allergy and Asthma Proceedings ◽

10.2500/aap.2020.41.200038 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (4) ◽

pp. 240-247

Author(s):

Lei Yang ◽

Qingtao Zhao ◽

Shuyu Wang

Keyword(s):

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Characteristic Curve ◽

False Negative ◽

Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽

True Negative ◽

Negative Results ◽

Noninvasive Biomarker ◽

Sensitivity Specificity ◽

Serum Periostin

Background: Serum periostin has been proposed as a noninvasive biomarker for asthma diagnosis and management. However, its accuracy for the diagnosis of asthma in different populations is not completely clear. Methods: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of periostin level in the clinical determination of asthma. Several medical literature data bases were searched for relevant studies through December 1, 2019. The numbers of patients with true-positive, false-positive, false-negative, and true-negative results for the periostin level were extracted from each individual study. We assessed the risk of bias by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. We used the meta-analysis to produce summary estimates of accuracy. Results: In total, nine studies with 1757 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios for the detection of asthma were 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38‐0.76), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74‐0.93), and 8.28 (95% CI, 3.67‐18.68), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79‐0.85). And significant publication bias was found in this meta‐analysis (p = 0.39). Conclusion: Serum periostin may be used for the diagnosis of asthma, with moderate diagnostic accuracy.

Download Full-text