Prophylactic internal iliac artery ligation versus balloon occlusion for placenta accreta spectrum disorders: A retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Papillon‐Smith ◽  
Sebastian Hobson ◽  
Lisa Allen ◽  
John Kingdom ◽  
Rory Windrim ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. S69-S70
Author(s):  
A. Bessissow ◽  
P. Delli Fraine ◽  
R. Bera ◽  
K. Muchantef ◽  
T. Cabrera ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Hong ◽  
Aner Chen ◽  
Jinliang Chen ◽  
Xiuxiu Li ◽  
Wenming Zhuang ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of internal iliac artery(IIA) balloon occlusion in patients with pernicious placenta previa coexisting with placenta accreta. Background: Pernicious placenta previa is frequently reported to be complicated with placenta accreta, which contributes to serious consequences such as severe obstetric postpartum hemorrhage or even maternal mortality. Methods: Fifty-eight pernicious placenta previa patients complicated with placenta accreta were retrospectively reviewed. The ballon group consisted of 23 patients, who underwent a caesarean delivery with internal iliac artery occlusion. 35 patients were in the control group, who had a standard caesarean delivery. The primary outcomes were estimated blood loss (EBL), cesarean hysterectomy, and blood transferring volume. The secondary outcomes were operating time, intraoperative hemostatic approaches, surgical complications, balloon catheter–related complications, length of maternal stay, cost of hospitalization, and neonatal outcomes.Results: No difference was observed in estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transferring percentages and volume, additional measures to secure hemostasis , surgical complications, hospital stay postoperatively and newborn outcomes. More than 40% of the balloon group underwent hysterectomy because of uncontrollable postpartum bleeding (10[43.48%] vs. 11[31.43%],P=0.350).Complications related to occlusion of IIA did not occur.The duration of the surgery of the balloon group was significantly longer than that of the control group(123.52 min±74.76 versus 89.17±48.68,P=0.038), and the total hospitalization cost was also significantly higher than that of the control group(45116.67±9358.67 yuan versus 30615.41±11587.44yuan,P=0.000).Conclusion: IIA balloon occlusion in patients with pernicious placenta previa coexisting with placenta accreta did not reduce the hysterectomy rate during cesarean section, nor did it reduce blood loss and blood transfusion, but it prolonged the duration of the surgery and increased the total cost.


VASA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-Li Wang ◽  
Xu-Hua Duan ◽  
Xin-Wei Han ◽  
Ling Wang ◽  
Xian-Lan Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: To compare the efficacy of temporary abdominal aortic occlusion with internal iliac artery occlusion for the management of placenta accreta. Patients and methods: 105 patients with placenta accreta were selected for treatment with temporary abdominal aortic occlusion (n = 57, group A) or bilateral iliac artery occlusion (n = 48, group B). Temporary abdominal aortic and internal iliac artery balloon occlusions were performed during caesarean sections. Data regarding the clinical success, blood loss, blood transfusion, balloon insertion time, fluoroscopy time, balloon occlusion time, foetal radiation dose, and complications were collected. Results: Temporary abdominal aortic occlusion and bilateral internal iliac artery occlusion were technically successful in all patients. The amount of blood loss (P < 0.001), amount of blood transfusion (P < 0.001), balloon insertion time (P < 0.001), foetal radiation dose (P < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (P < 0.01) in group A were significantly lower than those of patients in group B. No marked differences were found between these 2 groups with respect to age, mean postoperative hospital stay, balloon occlusion time, and Apgar score (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Temporary abdominal aortic balloon occlusion resulted in better clinical outcomes with less blood loss, blood transfusion, balloon insertion time, fluoroscopy time and foetal radiation dose than those in bilateral internal iliac balloon occlusion.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document