Graded motor imagery for complex regional pain syndrome: Where are we now?

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Maihöfner ◽  
V. Speck
2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 441-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Méndez-Rebolledo ◽  
Valeska Gatica-Rojas ◽  
Rafael Torres-Cueco ◽  
María Albornoz-Verdugo ◽  
Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz

2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie Lagueux ◽  
Joelle Charest ◽  
Eve Lefrançois-Caron ◽  
Marie-Eve Mauger ◽  
Emilie Mercier ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 550-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Johnson ◽  
J. Hall ◽  
S. Barnett ◽  
M. Draper ◽  
G. Derbyshire ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nélio Silva De Souza ◽  
Ana Carolina Gomes Martins ◽  
Victor Hugo Do Vale Bastos ◽  
Marco Orsini ◽  
Marco Antônio A. Leite ◽  
...  

The motor imagery (MI) has been proposed as a treatment in the complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS-1), since it seems to promote a brain reorganization effect on sensory- motor areas of pain perception. The aim of this paper is to investigate, through an integrative critical review, the influence of MI on the CRPS-1, correlating their evidence to clinical practice. Research in PEDro, Medline, Bireme and Google Scholar databases was conducted. Nine randomized controlled trials (level 2), 1 non-controlled clinical study (level 3), 1 case study (level 4), 1 systematic review (level 1), 2 review articles and 1 comment (level 5) were found. We can conclude that MI has shown effect in reducing pain and functionality that remains after 6 months of treatment. However, the difference between the MI strategies for CRPS-1 is unknown as well as the intensity of mental stress influences the painful response or effect of MI or other peripheral neuropathies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document