THE LIFE HISTORY OF ANISOLPIDIUM ECTOCARPII GEN. NOV. ET SP. NOV., AND A SYNOPSIS AND CLASSIFICATION OF OTHER FUNGI WITH ANTERIORLY UNIFLAGELLATE ZOOSPORES

1943 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 637-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
John S. Karling
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio A. De Bortoli ◽  
Alessandra M. Vacari ◽  
Roberto M. Goulart ◽  
Antonio S. Ferraudo ◽  
Haroldo X.L. Volpe

1898 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 205-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Ashmead

No species seems to be known in this family outside of the European and North American faunas, and very few species are described. The group was first treated as a subfamily by Newman as early as 1834.The imagoes appear very early in the year, or in February, March and April, deposit their eggs and then disappear, the consequence being that very few are taken and only a few of the commoner forms are known. With more careful collecting early in the season, however, the probabilities are that many more species will be discovered in our fauna.The imagoes of three distinct species of these insect, representing as many genera, have been bred recently from the larvæ by Dr. H. G. Dyar, and we are not only indebted to him for the first authentic life-history of a species in this group, but also for the first scientific description of the larva. His recent discovery of a large undescribed species in the rare genus Pleuroneura was most unexpected.


1962 ◽  
Vol 36 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 67-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daler Khan

Three new species of cercariae of the ‘Vivax’ type are described from London (U.K.) and the classification of this group of cercariae is discussed.The life-cycle of one of the cercariae is studied and different stages are described in detail.


2015 ◽  
pp. 151-158
Author(s):  
A. Zaostrovtsev

The review considers the first attempt in the history of Russian economic thought to give a detailed analysis of informal institutions (IF). It recognizes that in general it was successful: the reader gets acquainted with the original classification of institutions (including informal ones) and their genesis. According to the reviewer the best achievement of the author is his interdisciplinary approach to the study of problems and, moreover, his bias on the achievements of social psychology because the model of human behavior in the economic mainstream is rather primitive. The book makes evident that namely this model limits the ability of economists to analyze IF. The reviewer also shares the author’s position that in the analysis of the IF genesis the economists should highlight the uncertainty and reject economic determinism. Further discussion of IF is hardly possible without referring to this book.


1990 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
S H Lee ◽  
J Y Chai ◽  
S T Hong ◽  
W M Sohn
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document