scholarly journals Therapeutic plasma exchange in acute liver failure

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 589-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Stahl ◽  
Johannes Hadem ◽  
Andrea Schneider ◽  
Michael P. Manns ◽  
Olaf Wiesner ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 426-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward W. Holt ◽  
Jennifer Guy ◽  
Shelley M. Gordon ◽  
Jan C. Hofmann ◽  
Richard Garcia-Kennedy ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Joy Varghese ◽  
Vivek Joshi ◽  
Madhan Kumar Bollipalli ◽  
Selvakumar Malleeswaran ◽  
Rajinikanth Patcha ◽  
...  

Critical Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P510 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Demirkol ◽  
O Yanar ◽  
N Gerenli ◽  
A Citak ◽  
I Ozden ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Feng Yang ◽  
Yu-Ao ◽  
Lin-Mei Jin ◽  
Yumei Li

Abstract We aims to assess the efficacy and safety of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in pediatric acute liver failure (PALF) and to examine possible risk factors for mortality. Similar data are limited in PALF. Thirty-three cases diagnosed with PALF who received TPE from June 2011 to June 2021 in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the First Hospital of Jilin University were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. Descriptive statistics were used for the clinical features of these patients and TPE related variables. The effect of TPE was measured by the difference tests before and after treatment. Survivors with native livers and nonsurvivors were also compared by the difference tests. In the TPE combined with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) group (21/33, 63.6%), the patients were older, and more patients had multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (76.2% vs 25%, P =0.009) and a greater need for mechanical ventilation (86.2% vs 8.3%, P <0.001). TPE can significantly reduce alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and international normalized ratio . The most common complication in the overall population was hypocalcemia (n=12, 36%), while the most common complication in children under 2 years of age was hypotension (n=3, 40%). The mortality of liver transplant-free patients was 10/30 (30%). The nonsurvivor group had significantly more failed organs, longer PICU stays and more patients requiring ventilatory support. ConclusionsTPE alone or combined with CRRT can effectively improve liver function and may reduce mortality. TPE can be performed relatively safely in critically ill children, including younger patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 566-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleonora De Martin ◽  
Jean-Marie Michot ◽  
Barbara Papouin ◽  
Stephane Champiat ◽  
Olivier Lambotte ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Emma C. Alexander ◽  
Akash Deep

AbstractPaediatric acute liver failure (PALF) is a rare but devastating condition with high mortality. An exaggerated inflammatory response is now recognised as pivotal in the pathogenesis and prognosis of ALF, with cytokine spill from the liver to systemic circulation implicated in development of multi-organ failure associated with ALF. With advances in medical management, especially critical care, there is an increasing trend towards spontaneous liver regeneration, averting the need for emergency liver transplantation or providing stability to the patient awaiting a graft. Hence, research is ongoing for therapies, including extracorporeal liver support devices, that can bridge patients to transplant or spontaneous liver recovery. Considering the immune-related pathogenesis and inflammatory phenotype of ALF, plasma exchange serves as an ideal liver assist device as it performs both the excretory and synthetic functions of the liver and, in addition, works as an immunomodulatory therapy by suppressing the early innate immune response in ALF. After a recent randomised controlled trial in adults demonstrated a beneficial effect of high-volume plasma exchange on clinical outcomes, this therapy was incorporated in European Association for the Study of Liver (EASL) recommendations for managing adult patients with ALF, but no guidelines exist for PALF. In this review, we discuss rationale, timing, practicalities, and existing evidence regarding the use of plasma exchange as an immunomodulatory treatment in PALF. We discuss controversies in delivery of this therapy as an extracorporeal device, and practicalities of use of plasma exchange as a ‘hybrid’ therapy alongside other extracorporeal liver assist devices, before finally reviewing outstanding research questions for the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document