scholarly journals In Vivo Pelvic and Hip Joint Kinematics in Patients With Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Dual Fluoroscopy Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 823-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penny R. Atkins ◽  
Niccolo M. Fiorentino ◽  
Joseph A. Hartle ◽  
Stephen K. Aoki ◽  
Christopher L. Peters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Joint ◽  
Joint Kinematics ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

scholarly journals INSTRUMENTAL DIAGNOSIS AND PREOPERATIVE PLANNING OF HIP ARTHROSCOPY IN FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleg E. Bogopolskii
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Hip Joint ◽  
Hip Arthroscopy ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Pelvic Bone ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Technical Equipment ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Abstract. Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI) is essentially a mechanical conflict that occurs when the acetabulum edge of the pelvic bone interacts with femur head and neck with clinical symptoms. In a basis of this conflict, as a rule, is a single or bilateral anatomical bone defect that causes an irregular shape of the hip joint with congenital or acquired etiology. Radiography, performed in a direct projection and in 45 Dunn position with external rotation of 40, is traditionally considered as basic tool for the radiological diagnosis of hip joint pathology. It allows to assess the anatomical and morphological structure of joint surfaces and their relationship. Detection of severe hip deformations may require computed tomography (CT). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) is used to assess the condition of soft tissue structures of hip joint, its damage is often found in patients with FAI. The modern method of treating patients with FAI is hip arthroscopy, the undeniable advantage of which is low traumatic nature of the operation, low level of intraoperative complications and short postoperative rehabilitation period. For its successful implementation, it is necessary to take into account the complexity of performing hip arthroscopy, its duration, the necessity for good technical equipment and a high skill level of the operating surgeon. However, this operation has a number of limitations, which must be taken into account when selecting patients.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Requiring Surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. e070
Author(s):  
Natalie L. Leong ◽  
William Neal ◽  
Thomas Alter ◽  
Edward Beck ◽  
Shane J. Nho
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Acetabular Labral Tear Dimensions and Number of Suture Anchors Used to Repair in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume D. Dumont ◽  
Matthew J. Pacana ◽  
Adam J. Money ◽  
Thomas J. Ergen ◽  
Allen J. Barnes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoroacetabular Impingement ◽  
Impingement Syndrome ◽  
Labral Tear ◽  
Labral Repair ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Labral Tears ◽  
Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tear Size ◽  
Anterior Extent

AbstractFemoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is commonly associated with acetabular labral tears. Correction of impingement morphology and suture anchor repair of labral tears have demonstrated successful early and midterm patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the posterior and anterior extent and size of labral tears in patients with FAIS undergoing arthroscopic labral repair, and to evaluate the number of suture anchors required to repair these tears. The design of this study was retrospective case series (Level 4). A single surgeon's operative database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients undergoing primary arthroscopic hip labral repair between November 2014 and September 2019. Patient-specific factors and radiographic measurements were recorded. Arthroscopic findings including labral tear posterior and anterior extents, and the number of suture anchors utilized for the repair were recorded. Linear regression was performed to identify factors associated with labral tear size. The number of suture anchors used relative to labral tear size was calculated. Three-hundred and thirteen patients were included in the study. The mean posterior and anterior extent for labral tears were 11:22 ± 52 and 2:20 ± 34 minutes, respectively. Mean tear size was 2 hours, 58 minutes ± 45 minutes. The mean number of suture anchors utilized for labral repair was 3.1 ± 0.7. The mean number of anchors per hour of labral tear was 1.1 ± 0.3. Increased age, lateral center edge angle, and α angle were associated with larger labral tears. Our study found that acetabular labral tears associated with FAIS are, on average, 3 hours in size and centered in the anterosuperior quadrant of the acetabulum. Arthroscopic labral repair required 1.1 anchors per hour of tear size, resulting in a mean of 3.1 anchors per repair. Level of Evidence IV

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document