scholarly journals Flint maize root mycorrhization and organic acid exudates under phosphorus deficiency: Trends in breeding lines and doubled haploid lines from landraces

Author(s):  
Xuelian Li ◽  
Xiuhao Quan ◽  
Melissa Mang ◽  
Günter Neumann ◽  
Albrecht Melchinger ◽  
...  
1995 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 437-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Stringam ◽  
V. K. Bansal ◽  
M. R. Thiagarajah ◽  
D. F. Degenhardt ◽  
J. P. Tewari

The doubled haploid breeding method and greenhouse screening using cotyledon bio-assay were successfully applied to transfer blackleg resistance from the Australian cultivar Maluka (Brassicas napus), into susceptible advanced B. napus lines from the University of Alberta. This approach for blackleg resistance breeding was effective and efficient as several superior blackleg resistant breeding lines were identified within 4 yr from the initial cross. One of these lines (91–21864NA) was entered in the 1993 trials of the Western Canada Canola/Rapeseed Recommending Committee. Key words: Blackleg resistance, Leptosphaeria maculans, doubled haploid, Brassica napus


1980 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
PIERRE TURCOTTE ◽  
C. A. ST-PIERRE ◽  
KEH MING HO

Pedigree and doubled haploid lines from seven crosses of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) were compared over 2 years. The lines were tested, in a randomized complete block design, in row plots at Ste-Foy in 1977 and in hill plots at Brawley, California in 1978. There are significant differences between the two methods of pure line production for grain yield, 1000-kernel weight, plant height, resistance to lodging and date of maturity. Furthermore, these significant differences between doubled haploid and pedigree lines seem to be tied to wide crosses. After showing that doubled haploids are superior for resistance to lodging, we conclude that the use of doubled haploid lines must be seriously considered in a barley breeding program on the basis of improved selection efficiency and the short time required to get homozygous lines.


1989 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Baenziger ◽  
D. M. Wesenberg ◽  
V. M. Smail ◽  
W. L. Alexander ◽  
G. W. Schaeffer

Author(s):  
Kourosh Vahdati ◽  
Mohammad Sadat-Hosseini ◽  
Pedro Martínez-Gómez ◽  
Maria Antonietta Germanà

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. M. Showkath Babu ◽  
H. C. Lohithaswa ◽  
N. Mallikarjuna ◽  
Anand Pandravada ◽  
D. C. Balasundara

Crop Science ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 1448-1456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Toorchi ◽  
H. E. Shashidhar ◽  
T. M. Gireesha ◽  
Shailaja Hittalmani

Crop Science ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1737-1743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Frégeau‐Reid ◽  
Thin‐Meiw Choo ◽  
Keh‐Ming Ho ◽  
Richard A. Martin ◽  
Takeo Konishi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document