Soil properties and phosphate sorption

1958 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 551-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. G. Williams ◽  
N. M. Scott ◽  
Margaret J. McDonald
1987 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46
Author(s):  
Markku Yli-Halla

Sulphate sorption by 38 Finnish cultivated mineral soils was determined and its correlation with soil properties was studied. Sulphate sorption was correlated with soil pH (r =—0.46**) and with phosphate sorption (r =0.69***). With increasing soil pH, sulphate sorption decreased in relation to phosphate sorption. Phosphorus status was decisive in explaining the sulphate sorption of the soils. Even if both anions are sorbed by the same soil component (amorphous Al compounds), the sites are not available for sulphate if they are already occupied by phosphate. Sulphate sorption was negligible in soils very rich in easily soluble phosphorus. This was reflected in a close negative correlation between sulphate sorption and acid ammonium acetate (pH 4.65) extractable phosphorus (r =—0.70***). During the last few decades, phosphorus fertilization has increased the amount of easily soluble phosphorus in Finnish fields, which obviously has decreased the capacity of the soils to retain sulphate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 3846-3856
Author(s):  
Xiaomei Zheng ◽  
Jianfu Wu ◽  
Xiao Yan ◽  
Guobing Qin ◽  
Rongwei Zhou ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 1299-1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Amrani ◽  
D. G. Westfall ◽  
L. Moughli

1990 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15
Author(s):  
Raina Niskanen

The dependence of the indicator of phosphate sorption capacity on extractable Al and Fe and other soil properties was studied in a material consisting of 102 mineral soil samples. The sum of P adsorbed on soil during two days from a solution containing P 5 mmol/l and P extracted by 0.02 M EDTA (pH 5.3) as an estimate of the initial P content in the soil was used as the indicator of P sorption capacity. In clay and silt soils (n = 51), the Al and Fe extracted by 0.05 M oxalate (pH 2.9) together with the organic C content explained 85 %, the Al and Fe extracted by 0.05 M K4P2O7 (pH 10) together with the clay content 87 %, the Al and Fe extracted by 0.02 M EDTA (pH 5.3) 91 %, and the Al extracted by 1 M CH3COONH4 (pH 4.8) together with the organic C and clay contents 78 % of the variation of the indicator of phosphate sorption capacity. In coarse soils (n = 51), the variation of the indicator was explained well only by oxalate-extractable metals, which together with soil pH and clay content explained 80 % of the variation. Extractable Al was generally the most important explainer of variation. The results suggest that forms of extractable Al and Fe explaining the variation of the indicator of P sorption capacity in clay and silt soils are partially different from those in coarse soils.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document