Salvage surgical resection after high-dose ifosfamide (HDIF) based regimens in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS): A potential positive selection bias-A study of the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS)

10052 Background: High-dose ifosfamide (HDI) has shown promising activity as single agent in first-line chemotherapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The purpose of this study was to assess the activity and toxicity of a preoperative doxorubicin-free regimen of HDI given concurrently with radiotherapy (RT) and followed by surgery in patients (pts) with localized high-risk STS. Methods: Pts with localized > 5 cm grade 2-3 and deep STS of the extremities and trunk wall, ≤65 years, no prior chemotherapy and ECOG PS 0-1 were enrolled in this multicenter phase II study. Pts received 3 cycles of preoperative HDI at a dose of 12 gr/m2 by continuous infusion over 5 days every 3 weeks, with mesna and prophylactic GCSF support, and concomitant external beam RT to a total dose of 50 Gy, followed by surgical resection. Postoperatively, pts with pathological response received 2 cycles of HDI and those with positive surgical margins 16 Gy of RT. The primary study endpoint was pathologic response (≥ 95% pathologic necrosis). A Simon 2-stage design (response rate P0=15%, P1=35%, α=0.10, β=0.10) required at least 2 responses in the first 17 pts to expand to a second cohort, and 7/32 responses to be considered of positive. Results: From March 08 to December 10, 34 pts were included. Two pts were ineligible. Median age was 54 (18-65). Tumor location was extremity (28 pts) and trunk wall (4). Preoperative planned treatment was completed in 87.5% pts. HDI was completed in 87.5% pts while RT in 94% pts. Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenic fever (3 pts), anemia (4), asthenia (2), infection (2) and radiation dermatitis (2). 31 pts underwent surgery: 27 were R0 resections, of which 2 were amputations, and 4 were R1 resections. Pathologic response was ≥ 95% necrosis in 9 pts (28%) and 50%-94% necrosis in 12 pts. After a median follow-up of 21 months, estimated 2-year rates for disease-free survival and overall survival were 58% (95%CI, 40%-77%) and 77% (95%CI, 61%-93%), respectively. Conclusions: Preoperative treatment with HDI given concurrently with RT in pts with high-risk STS is feasible and safe, yielding promising pathologic response rates.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Sequential High-Dose Doxorubicin and Ifosfamide Compared With Standard-Dose Doxorubicin in Patients With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: An Open-Label Randomized Phase II Study of the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2008.19.2930 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (11) ◽

pp. 1893-1898 ◽

Cited By ~ 47

Author(s):

Joan Maurel ◽

Antonio López-Pousa ◽

Ramón de las Peñas ◽

Joaquín Fra ◽

Javier Martín ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Soft Tissue ◽

Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽

Standard Dose ◽

Performance Status ◽

Single Agent ◽

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽

High Dose ◽

Open Label ◽

Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽

Ecog Performance Status

Purpose To assess the progression-free survival (PFS) and antitumor response to standard-dose doxorubicin compared with sequential dose-dense doxorubicin and ifosfamide in first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Patients and Methods Patients with measurable advanced soft tissue sarcoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) < 2, between the ages 18 and 65 years, and with adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function were entered in the study. The stratifications were: ECOG PS (0 v 1), location of metastases, and potentially resectable disease. Patients were randomly assigned to either doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 given as a bolus injection every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (arm A) or doxorubicin at 30 mg/m2 per day for 3 consecutive days once every 2 weeks for 3 cycles followed by ifosfamide at 12.5 g/m2 delivered by continuous infusion over 5 days once every 3 weeks for 3 cycles with filgastrim or pegfilgastrim support (arm B). Results Between December 2003 and September 2007, 132 patients were entered onto the study. Febrile neutropenia, asthenia, and mucositis were more frequent in the arm B. The interim preplanned analysis for futility allowed the premature closure. Objective responses were observed in 23.4% of assessable patients in arm A and 24.1% in arm B. PFS was 26 weeks in the arm A and 24 weeks in arm B (P = .88). Overall survival did not differ between the two therapeutic arms (P = .14). Conclusion Single-agent doxorubicin remains the standard treatment in fit patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Download Full-text