Chromatographic methods enabling the characterization of stationary phases and retention prediction in high-performance liquid chromatography and supercritical fluid chromatography

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Sykora ◽  
Jiri Vozka ◽  
Eva Tesarova
Keyword(s):  
High Performance Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Supercritical Fluid ◽  
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Stationary Phases ◽  
Retention Prediction ◽  
Chromatographic Methods

scholarly journals Comparison of Retention Behavior between Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Various Stationary Phases

Molecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (13) ◽  
pp. 2425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsunehisa Hirose ◽  
Daniel Keck ◽  
Yoshihiro Izumi ◽  
Takeshi Bamba
Keyword(s):  
High Performance Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Supercritical Fluid ◽  
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Stationary Phases ◽  
Retention Factor ◽  
Normal Phase ◽  
Retention Behavior ◽  
Selection Of

The retention behavior of a wide variety of stationary phases was compared in supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and normal-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (NP-HPLC). We also attempted to elucidate the retention behavior in SFC by investigating the selectivity of the different stationary phases. SFC separation conditions with polar stationary phases, such as silica gel (SL) and diol (Diol) phases, operate via adsorptions that include hydrophilic and ionic interactions similar to those in NP-HPLC. Moreover, non-polar stationary phases, such as pentabromophenyl (PBr), pyrenylethyl (PYE), and octadecyl (C18), could be used despite the non-polar mobile phase conditions, because the dispersion and π-π interactions were stronger in SFC than in HPLC. These results reflect the selectivity of the stationary phase and its retention factor, thus providing useful information for the selection of appropriate stationary phases for particular analytes.

scholarly journals Progress in the Enantioseparation of β-Blockers by Chromatographic Methods

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 468
Author(s):  
Yiwen Yang ◽  
Yehui Wang ◽  
Zongbi Bao ◽  
Qiwei Yang ◽  
Zhiguo Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Performance Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Supercritical Fluid ◽  
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Simulated Moving Bed ◽  
Moving Bed ◽  
Chromatographic Methods ◽  
Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography ◽  
Β Blockers

β-adrenergic antagonists (β-blockers) with at least one chiral center are an exceedingly important class of drugs used mostly to treat cardiovascular diseases. At least 70 β-blockers have been investigated in history. However, only a few β-blockers, e.g., timolol, are clinically marketed as an optically pure enantiomer. Therefore, the separation of racemates of β-blockers is essential both in the laboratory and industry. Many approaches have been explored to obtain the single enantiomeric β-blocker, including high performance liquid chromatography, supercritical fluid chromatography and simulated moving bed chromatography. In this article, a review is presented on different chromatographic methods applied for the enantioseparation of β-blockers, covering high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and simulated moving bed chromatography (SMB).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document