In vivo and in vitro effects of an Er:YAG laser, a GaAlAs diode laser, and scaling and root planing on periodontally diseased root surfaces: A comparative histologic study

2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 359-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Schwarz ◽  
Anton Sculean ◽  
Mohammad Berakdar ◽  
Ludwig Szathmari ◽  
Thomas Georg ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 328-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Schwarz ◽  
Norbert Pütz ◽  
Thomas Georg ◽  
Elmar Reich
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Crespi ◽  
Antonio Barone ◽  
Ugo Covani

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 38-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilou Ciantar

Non-surgical periodontal treatment has traditionally been based on the notion that bacterial plaque (dental biofilm) penetrates and infects dental cementum. Removal of this infected cementum via scaling and root planing (SRP) was considered essential for re-establishing periodontal health. In the 1980s the concept of SRP was questioned because several in vitro studies showed that the biofilm was superficially located on the root surface and its disruption and removal could be relatively easily achieved by ultrasonic instrumentation of the root surface (known as root surface debridement (RSD). Subsequent in vivo studies corroborated the in vitro findings. There is now sufficient clinical evidence to substantiate the concept that the deliberate removal of cementum by SRP is no longer warranted or justified, and that the more gentle and conservative approach of RSD should be implemented in daily periodontal practice.


2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Letícia Helena Theodoro ◽  
Valdir Gouveia Garcia ◽  
Patrícia Haypek ◽  
Denise Maria Zezell ◽  
Carlos de Paula Eduardo

The purpose of this study was to morphologically evaluate, by means of scanning electron microscopy, the effects of Er:YAG laser on the treatment of root surfaces submitted to scaling and root planing with conventional periodontal instruments. Eighteen root surfaces (n = 18), which had been previously scaled and planed, were assigned to 3 groups (n = 6). The control Group (G1) received no further treatment; Group 2 (G2) was irradiated with Er:YAG laser (2.94 mum), with 47 mJ/10 Hz, in a focused mode with air/water spray during 15 s and with 0.57 J/cm² of fluency per pulse; Group 3 (G 3) was irradiated with Er:YAG laser (2.94 mum), with 83 mJ/10 Hz, in a focused mode with air/water spray during 15 s and with 1.03 J/cm² of fluency per pulse. We concluded that the parameters adopted for Group 3 removed the smear layer from the root surface, exposing the dentinal tubules. Although no fissures, cracks or carbonized areas were observed, an irregular surface was produced by Er:YAG laser irradiation. Thus, the biocompatibility of the irradiated root surface, within the periodontal healing process, must be assessed.


2005 ◽  
Vol 76 (8) ◽  
pp. 1386-1390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Crespi ◽  
Antonio Barone ◽  
Ugo Covani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document