scholarly journals Reply to: “Brief Clinical Rating Scales Should Not Be Overlooked”

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1886-1886
Author(s):  
Gesine Respondek ◽  
Ines Piot ◽  
Günter U. Höglinger
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. e47-e48
Author(s):  
S.A. Castillo Torres ◽  
D.G. Martínez-Roque ◽  
J. Duarte-Bravo ◽  
C.A. Soto-Rincón ◽  
F. Flores-Alfaro ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christelle Imbert ◽  
Erwan Bezard ◽  
Stéphane Guitraud ◽  
Thomas Boraud ◽  
Christian E Gross

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 703-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhulika A. Gupta ◽  
Andrew M. Johnson ◽  
Mary-Margaret Chren

Author(s):  
Joseph F. McGuire ◽  
Eric A. Storch ◽  
Wayne Goodman

Evidence-based assessment is a cornerstone for evidence-based treatment. This chapter provides an introduction to commonly used rating scales of OCD symptom severity for an evidence-based assessment. This includes clinician-administered measures, self-report, and parent-and-child report rating scales. Given the importance of OCD symptom dimensions, this chapter also presents measures to assess specific OCD symptom dimensions. The chapter concludes with considerations for selecting rating scales as part of an evidence-based assessment for children and adults with OCD.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. S44-S45
Author(s):  
F. Riva ◽  
P.Tamburini ◽  
D. Mazzoli ◽  
R. Stagni

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1779-1784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Bürk ◽  
Ulrike Mälzig ◽  
Stefanie Wolf ◽  
Suzette Heck ◽  
Konstantinos Dimitriadis ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. S229-S232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maja Relja

Author(s):  
A. K. Mansfield ◽  
G. K. Keitner ◽  
R. A. Archambault

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document