A secondary analysis to inform a clinical decision rule for predicting skull fracture and intracranial injury in children under age 2

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-39
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Stone ◽  
Leslie L. Davis ◽  
Thomas P. McCoy ◽  
Debbie Travers ◽  
Elizabeth Van Horn ◽  
...  
CJEM ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 150-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siang Ong ◽  
Anne-Maree Kelly ◽  
Barry Gunn

ABSTRACTObjective:The Quebec shoulder dislocation rule is a recently derived clinical decision rule to guide physicians on the selective use of radiography in patients with shoulder dislocation. The aim of this studywas to validate the Quebec shoulder dislocation rule.Methods:This was a secondary analysis of data collected in a retrospective cohort study. All patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) between January 1, 2003, and October 31, 2008, with a diagnosis of shoulder dislocation or fracture-dislocation were identified from ED management databases. Data collected included demographics, mechanism of injury, and presence of fracture. The outcome of interest was predictive performance of the Quebec shoulder dislocation rule for patients aged under 40 years on this cohort. Data analysis is descriptive.Results:Of the 346 patients identified, 196 were aged under 40 years, and 174 (89%) were male; the median age was 25 years (interquartile range 21–29 years), and 58 were recurrent dislocations. One hundred sixteen patients (59%) met the Quebec high-risk criteria, and 80 (41%) were classified as low risk. In the 196 patients aged less than 40 years, 12 fractures as defined were identified (6%). When applied to this cohort, the Quebec clinical decision rule had a sensitivity of 0.42 (95% CI 0.16–0.71), a specificity of 0.40 (95% CI 0.33–0.47), and a negative predictive value of 0.91 (95% CI 0.82–0.96).Conclusion:The Quebec shoulder dislocation rule had poor sensitivity for clinically significant fractures associated with shoulder dislocations in young patients (aged 16–39 years) presenting to an Australian emergency department. Its use cannot be recommended.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. e42-e43
Author(s):  
J Gravel ◽  
S Gouin ◽  
D Chalut ◽  
L Crevier ◽  
JC Décarie ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 187 (16) ◽  
pp. 1202-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Gravel ◽  
Serge Gouin ◽  
Dominic Chalut ◽  
Louis Crevier ◽  
Jean-Claude Décarie ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 551-557.e25
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Wall ◽  
Oliver Mayorga ◽  
Christine E. Banfield ◽  
Mark E. Wall ◽  
Ilan Aisic ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 517-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter B. Richman ◽  
Tyler F. Vadeboncoeur ◽  
Vatsal Chikani ◽  
Lani Clark ◽  
Bentley J. Bobrow

Injury ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 1798-1799 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.M.J. Walenkamp ◽  
N.W.L. Schep

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 558-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romolo J. Gaspari ◽  
David Blehar ◽  
David Polan ◽  
Anthony Montoya ◽  
Amal Alsulaibikh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document