scholarly journals Sparse Data Representation of Random Fields

PAMM ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 587-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Litvinenko ◽  
Hermann G. Matthies
Author(s):  
Nagadastagiri Challapalle ◽  
Sahithi Rampalli ◽  
Linghao Song ◽  
Nandhini Chandramoorthy ◽  
Karthik Swaminathan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya Tafolla ◽  
Eappen Nelluvelil ◽  
Jacob Moore ◽  
Daniel Dunning ◽  
Nathaniel Morgan ◽  
...  

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. V215-V231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina Liu ◽  
Jianwei Ma ◽  
Gerlind Plonka

We have developed a new regularization method for the sparse representation and denoising of seismic data. Our approach is based on two components: a sparse data representation in a learned dictionary and a similarity measure for image patches that is evaluated using the Laplacian matrix of a graph. Dictionary-learning (DL) methods aim to find a data-dependent basis or a frame that admits a sparse data representation while capturing the characteristics of the given data. We have developed two algorithms for DL based on clustering and singular-value decomposition, called the first and second dictionary constructions. Besides using an adapted dictionary, we also consider a similarity measure for the local geometric structures of the seismic data using the Laplacian matrix of a graph. Our method achieves better denoising performance than existing denoising methods, in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio values and visual estimation of weak-event preservation. Comparisons of experimental results on field data using traditional [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text] deconvolution (FX-Decon) and curvelet thresholding methods are also provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document