scholarly journals Microsecond duration pressure pulse generator for in situ dynamically loaded SEM fracture studies

Scanning ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-173
Author(s):  
B. H. Fishbine ◽  
R. J. Macy
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Roman Obertyukh ◽  
Andrii Slabkyi ◽  
Leonid K. Polishchuk ◽  
Serhii Andrukhov ◽  
Larysa E. Nykiforova ◽  
...  

1965 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 811-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip B. Callaghan ◽  
M. Gaines Chesnut ◽  
David H. Watkins

1996 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 1938
Author(s):  
F. Plisek ◽  
B. Hartinger

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (06) ◽  
pp. T06008-T06008 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cohen ◽  
D. Levi-Hevroni ◽  
P. Fridman ◽  
D. Chapman ◽  
A. Rack ◽  
...  

1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. KUTSCHENREUTER, JR. ◽  
T. COLLINS ◽  
W. VIER, III

2003 ◽  
Vol 807 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Zhang ◽  
M. Takeda

ABSTRACTThe accurate hydraulic characterization of low permeability geological materials and formations has important practical implications, such as the geological disposal of radioactive nuclear waste. In this paper, we discuss pressure pulse techniques, which are methods that are commonly adopted both in the laboratory and in situ for testing low permeability geological materials and formations. The results obtained in this study illustrate that: 1) the use of nominal values for water compressibility will lead to significant underestimation of permeability from the pressure pulse tests; 2) specific storage is also an important parameter that should be evaluated simultaneously with permeability; 3) to shorten the time required to measure low permeability in the laboratory, it is advisable to use disk-shaped specimens; 4) when a geological formation is anisotropic, the value of permeability calculated using an isotropic model is between the maximum and minimum permeabilities of the geological formation; 5) the values of permeability and specific storage derived from an in situ pressure pulse test may only reflect the hydraulic properties of the domain closely surrounding the test well. Caution should be exercised when interpreting data derived from the pressure pulse tests for the purpose of safety assessment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 679-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Ralston ◽  
Patti Ogden ◽  
Michael H. Kohrman ◽  
David M. Frim

Vagus nerve stimulators (VNSs) are currently an accepted treatment for intractable epilepsy not amenable to ablative surgery. Battery death and lead damage are the main reasons for reoperation in patients with VNSs. In general, any damage to the lead requires revision surgery to remove the helical electrodes from the vagus nerve and replace the electrode array and wire. The electrodes are typically scarred and difficult to remove from the vagus nerve without injury. The authors describe 6 patients with VNSs who presented with low lead impedance on diagnostic testing, leading to the intraoperative finding of lead insulation disruption, or who were found incidentally at the time of implantable pulse generator battery replacement to have a tear in the outer insulation of the electrode wire. Instead of replacement, the wire insulation was repaired and reinforced in situ, leading to normal impedance testing. All 6 devices remained functional over a follow-up period of up to 87 months, with 2 of the 6 patients having a relatively shorter follow-up of only 12 months. This technique, applicable in a subset of patients with VNSs requiring lead exploration, obviates the need for lead replacement with its attendant risks.


2021 ◽  
Vol 922 (2) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Justyna M. Sokół ◽  
Maher A. Dayeh ◽  
Stephen A. Fuselier ◽  
Georgios Nicolaou ◽  
D. J. McComas ◽  
...  

Abstract In late 2016, the Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) observed an enhancement of hydrogen energetic neutral atom (ENA) flux in ∼20° south from the nose direction. This enhancement was a consequence of an abrupt increase of the solar wind (SW) dynamic pressure observed at 1 au in late 2014. In subsequent years, the increased flux of 4.3 keV ENAs was observed at higher latitudes filling in the heliosheath, in ENAs at lower energies, and the Ribbon flux. We observe that the rapid increase of SW pressure occurs every solar cycle (SC) from the beginning of the regular in situ SW measurements in the ecliptic plane. The SW pressure pulse happens about 4.7 yr from the beginning of each SC, it is during the maximum phase of solar activity, and repeats with a period of ∼10.2 yr. These repeating pulses of the SW pressure can cause periodic SC variations of the ENA production in the heliosheath. We follow McComas et al. results for the relation between SW pressure increase and ENA flux enhancement to investigate the periodic SW pressure increases and their consequences for the heliosphere. Our study of time delay between the cause (pressure pulse at 1 au) and the consequence (ENA enhancement) show that IBEX observed in 2009–2011 remnants of the SW pressure pulse that happened during the maximum of SC 23.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document