On Pressure Pulse Techniques for Testing Low Permeability Geological Materials and Formations

2003 ◽  
Vol 807 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Zhang ◽  
M. Takeda
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Pulse ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Specific Storage ◽  
Geological Materials ◽  
Geological Formation ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Practical Implications ◽  
Significant Underestimation

ABSTRACTThe accurate hydraulic characterization of low permeability geological materials and formations has important practical implications, such as the geological disposal of radioactive nuclear waste. In this paper, we discuss pressure pulse techniques, which are methods that are commonly adopted both in the laboratory and in situ for testing low permeability geological materials and formations. The results obtained in this study illustrate that: 1) the use of nominal values for water compressibility will lead to significant underestimation of permeability from the pressure pulse tests; 2) specific storage is also an important parameter that should be evaluated simultaneously with permeability; 3) to shorten the time required to measure low permeability in the laboratory, it is advisable to use disk-shaped specimens; 4) when a geological formation is anisotropic, the value of permeability calculated using an isotropic model is between the maximum and minimum permeabilities of the geological formation; 5) the values of permeability and specific storage derived from an in situ pressure pulse test may only reflect the hydraulic properties of the domain closely surrounding the test well. Caution should be exercised when interpreting data derived from the pressure pulse tests for the purpose of safety assessment.

scholarly journals Characterization of Gas Transport in Low-Permeability Media: Two-Phase Flow Analysis of an In-Situ Experiment

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Gerard ◽  
Jean-Pol Radu ◽  
Rémi de La Vaissière ◽  
Jean Talandier ◽  
Robert Charlier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Gas Transport ◽  
Flow Analysis ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
In Situ Experiment ◽  
Two Phase

A review of specific storage values from pore pressure response to passive in situ stresses: Implications for sustainable groundwater management

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy A Timms ◽  
M Faysal Chowdhury ◽  
Gabriel C Rau
Keyword(s):  
Groundwater Management ◽  
Pore Pressure ◽  
Pressure Response ◽  
Earth Tides ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
Specific Storage ◽  
Sustainable Groundwater Management ◽  
In Situ Stresses ◽  
Pore Pressure Response

<p>Specific storage (S<sub>s</sub>) values are important for analyzing the quantity of stored groundwater and for predicting drawdown to ensure sustainable pumping. This research compiled S<sub>s</sub> values from multiple available studies based on pore pressure responses to passive stresses, for comparison and discussion with relevant poroelastic theory and groundwater applications. We find that S<sub>s</sub> values from pore pressure responses to passive in situ stresses ranged from 1.3x10<sup>-7</sup> to 3.7x10<sup>-5</sup> m<sup>-1</sup> (geomean 2.0x10<sup>-6</sup> m-1, n=64 from 24 studies). This large S<sub>s</sub> dataset for confined aquifers included both consolidated and unconsolidated strata by extending two recent literature reviews. The dataset included several passive methods: Individual strains from Earth tides and atmospheric loading, their combined effect, and values derived from soil moisture loading due to rainfall events. The range of S<sub>s</sub> values spans approx. 2 orders of magnitude, far less than for hydraulic conductivity, a finding that has important implications for sustainable groundwater management. Both the range of values and maximum S<sub>s</sub> values in this large dataset were significantly smaller than S<sub>s</sub> values commonly applied including laboratory testing of cores, aquifer pump testing and numerical groundwater modelling. </p><p>Results confirm that S<sub>s</sub> is overestimated by assuming incompressible grains, particularly for consolidated rocks. It was also evident that Ss that commonly assumes uniaxial conditions underestimate S<sub>s</sub> that accounts for areal or volumetric conditions.  Further research is required to ensure that S<sub>s</sub> is not underestimated by assuming instantaneous pore pressure response to strains, particularly in low permeability strata. However, in low permeability strata S<sub>s</sub> could also be overestimated if based on total porosity (or moisture content) rather than a smaller free water content, due to water adsorbed by clay minerals. Further evaluation is also required for influences on S<sub>s</sub> from monitoring bore construction (ie. screen and casing or grouting), and S<sub>s</sub> derived from tidal stresses (undrained or constant mass conditions) that could underestimate S<sub>s</sub> applicable to groundwater pumping (drained or changing mass conditions). In summary, poroelastic effects that are often neglected in groundwater studies are clearly important for quantifying water flow and storage in strata with changing hydraulic stress and loading conditions. </p>

The Use of Advanced Analytical Techniques for Characterization of the Chemical, Physical, and Crystallographic Nature of a Surface

1973 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 132-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Herfert
Keyword(s):  
Surface Characterization ◽  
Analytical Techniques ◽  
X Ray Diffraction ◽  
Depth Of Penetration ◽  
X Ray ◽  
The Past ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Scanning Electron

Studies of the nature of a surface, either metallic or nonmetallic, in the past, have been limited to the instrumentation available for these measurements. In the past, optical microscopy, replica transmission electron microscopy, electron or X-ray diffraction and optical or X-ray spectroscopy have provided the means of surface characterization. Actually, some of these techniques are not purely surface; the depth of penetration may be a few thousands of an inch. Within the last five years, instrumentation has been made available which now makes it practical for use to study the outer few 100A of layers and characterize it completely from a chemical, physical, and crystallographic standpoint. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) provides a means of viewing the surface of a material in situ to magnifications as high as 250,000X.

A very rapid in situ Kikuchi technique to determine relative crystal misorientation

1988 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 830-831
Author(s):  
J. I. Bennetch
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Analytical Techniques ◽  
Superplastic Forming ◽  
The Other ◽  
Kikuchi Pattern ◽  
Kikuchi Line ◽  
Line Analysis

In a recent study of the superplastic forming (SPF) behavior of certain Al-Li-X alloys, the relative misorientation between adjacent (sub)grains proved to be an important parameter. It is well established that the most accurate way to determine misorientation across boundaries is by Kikuchi line analysis. However, the SPF study required the characterization of a large number of (sub)grains in each sample to be statistically meaningful, a very time-consuming task even for comparatively rapid Kikuchi analytical techniques.In order to circumvent this problem, an alternate, even more rapid in-situ Kikuchi technique was devised, eliminating the need for the developing of negatives and any subsequent measurements on photographic plates. All that is required is a double tilt low backlash goniometer capable of tilting ± 45° in one axis and ± 30° in the other axis. The procedure is as follows. While viewing the microscope screen, one merely tilts the specimen until a standard recognizable reference Kikuchi pattern is centered, making sure, at the same time, that the focused electron beam remains on the (sub)grain in question.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document