Integrated and iterative systems engineering and software requirements engineering for technical systems

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 722-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Holtmann ◽  
Ruslan Bernijazov ◽  
Matthias Meyer ◽  
David Schmelter ◽  
Christian Tschirner
Keyword(s):  
Requirements Engineering ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Software Requirements ◽  
Iterative Systems ◽  
Technical Systems

Abstraction: An alternative neurocognitive account of recognition, prediction, and decision making

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie F. Reyna ◽  
David A. Broniatowski
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Software Engineering ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Extensive Literature ◽  
Trace Theory ◽  
Fuzzy Trace Theory ◽  
Abstract Representations ◽  
Technical Systems

Abstract Gilead et al. offer a thoughtful and much-needed treatment of abstraction. However, it fails to build on an extensive literature on abstraction, representational diversity, neurocognition, and psychopathology that provides important constraints and alternative evidence-based conceptions. We draw on conceptions in software engineering, socio-technical systems engineering, and a neurocognitive theory with abstract representations of gist at its core, fuzzy-trace theory.

Systems Engineering Plan for Navy Theater-Wide Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD). Volume 1. System Requirements Engineering

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Stafford ◽  
Kniceley Jr. ◽  
Monteith Roger L. ◽  
Kimbrell Gregory E. ◽  
Jones Thomas W. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Requirements Engineering ◽  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Ballistic Missile ◽  
Missile Defense ◽  
Ballistic Missile Defense ◽  
System Requirements

Software Requirements Engineering Methodology

1976 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. D. Richter ◽  
J. D. Mason ◽  
M. W. Alford ◽  
I. F. Burns ◽  
H. A. Helton
Keyword(s):  
Requirements Engineering ◽  
Software Requirements

Requirements Prioritization Techniques for Global Software Engineering

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samina Saghir ◽  
Tasleem Mustafa
Keyword(s):  
Software Engineering ◽  
Requirements Engineering ◽  
Search Tree ◽  
Software Requirements ◽  
Binary Search Tree ◽  
Time Zone ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Requirements Prioritization ◽  
Global Software Engineering ◽  
Hierarchy Process

<p>Increase in globalization of the industry of software requires an exploration of requirements engineering (RE) in software development institutes at multiple locations. Requirements engineering task is very complicated when it is performed at single site, but it becomes too much complex when stakeholder groups define well-designed requirements under language, time zone and cultural limits. Requirements prioritization (RP) is considered as an imperative part of software requirements engineering in which requirements are ranked to develop best-quality software. In this research, a comparative study of the requirements prioritization techniques was done to overcome the challenges initiated by the corporal distribution of stakeholders within the organization at multiple locations. The objective of this study was to make a comparison between five techniques for prioritizing software requirements and to discuss the results for global software engineering. The selected techniques were Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Cumulative Voting (CV), Value Oriented Prioritization (VOP), Binary Search Tree (BST), and Numerical Assignment Technique (NAT). At the end of the research a framework for Global Software Engineering (GSE) was proposed to prioritize the requirements for stakeholders at distributed locations.<strong></strong></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document