Neurodevelopment at 2 years and umbilical artery Doppler in cases of very preterm birth after prenatal hypertensive disorder or suspected fetal growth restriction: EPIPAGE ‐2 prospective population‐based cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Delorme ◽  
G. Kayem ◽  
E. Lorthe ◽  
L. Sentilhes ◽  
J. Zeitlin ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 794-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Gagliardi ◽  
Franca Rusconi ◽  
Monica Da Frè ◽  
Giorgio Mello ◽  
Virgilio Carnielli ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 157 (5) ◽  
pp. 733-739.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Zeitlin ◽  
Mayass El Ayoubi ◽  
Pierre-Henri Jarreau ◽  
Elizabeth S. Draper ◽  
Béatrice Blondel ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S386-S387
Author(s):  
Eileen Xu ◽  
Nandini Raghuraman ◽  
Katherine H. Bligard ◽  
Jeffrey Dicke ◽  
Anthony O. Odibo ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (13) ◽  
pp. 1263-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arsenio Spinillo ◽  
Barbara Gardella ◽  
Silvia Bariselli ◽  
Alessandro Alfei ◽  
Enrico Silini ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eline Skirnisdottir Vik ◽  
Roy Miodini Nilsen ◽  
Vigdis Aasheim ◽  
Rhonda Small ◽  
Dag Moster ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: This study compares subsequent birth outcomes in migrant women who had already had a child before arriving in Norway with those in migrant women whose first birth occurred in Norway. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between country of first birth and adverse neonatal outcomes (very preterm birth, moderately preterm birth, post-term birth, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, low Apgar score, stillbirth and neonatal death) in parous migrant and Norwegian-born women. Methods: National population-based study including second and subsequent singleton births in Norway from 1990-2016. Data were retrieved from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and Statistics Norway. Neonatal outcomes were compared between births to: 1) migrant women with a first birth before immigration to Norway (n=30,062) versus those with a first birth after immigration (n=66,006), and 2) Norwegian-born women with a first birth outside Norway (n=6,205) versus those with a first birth in Norway (n=514,799). Associations were estimated as crude and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multiple logistic regression. Results: Migrant women with a first birth before immigrating to Norway had increased odds of adverse outcomes in subsequent births relative to those with a first birth after immigration: very preterm birth (22-31 gestational weeks (gwks); aOR=1.27; CI 1.09-1.48), moderately preterm birth (32-36 gwks; aOR=1.10; CI 1.02-1.18), post-term birth (≥42 gwks; aOR=1.19; CI 1.11-1.27), low Apgar score (<7 at 5 minutes; aOR=1.27; CI 1.16-1.39) and stillbirth (aOR=1.29; CI 1.05-1.58). Similar results were found in the sample of births to Norwegian-born women. Conclusions: The increased odds of adverse neonatal outcomes for migrant and Norwegian-born women who had their first births outside Norway should serve as a reminder of the importance of taking a careful obstetric history in these parous women to ensure appropriate care for their subsequent pregnancies and births in Norway. Keywords: immigration, parous women, neonatal outcomes, obstetric history, predictor


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document