adverse neonatal outcomes
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

340
(FIVE YEARS 157)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Author(s):  
Abdullah Alnoman ◽  
Ahmad Badeghiesh ◽  
Haitham Baghlaf ◽  
Magdalena Peeva ◽  
MH Dahan

Objectives: Women with Down syndrome (DS) suffer from several health issues, however, their fecundity is not affected. Despite that, there are no studies in the literature to address pregnancy, delivery, or neonatal outcomes among women with DS. Design: We conducted a retrospective study using the Health Care Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database over 11 years from 2004 to 2014. Methods: A delivery cohort was created using ICD-9 codes. ICD-9 code 758.0 was used to extract the cases of maternal DS. Pregnant women with DS (study group) were matched based on age and health insurance type to women without DS (control) at a ratio of 1:4. A multivariant logistic regression model was used to adjust for statistically significant variables (P-value < 0.5). Results: There were a total of 9,096,788 deliveries during the study period. Of those, 185 pregnant women were found to have DS. The matched control group was 740. Maternal pregnancy risks mostly did not differ between those with and without DS including pregnancy-induced PIH, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, PPROM, chorioamnionitis, cesarean section, operative vaginal delivery, or blood transfusion (P >0.05, all). However, they were at extremely increased risk of delivering prematurely (aOR 3.86, 95% CI 1.25-11.93), and to have adverse neonatal outcomes such as small for gestational age (aOR 13.13, 95% CI 2.20-78.41), intrauterine fetal demise (aOR 20.97, 95% CI 1.86-237.02), and congenital anomalies (aOR 9.59, 95% CI 1.47-62.72). Conclusion: Women with DS should be counseled about their increased risk of premature delivery and adverse neonatal outcomes.


2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S179
Author(s):  
Naiha Mussarat ◽  
Jane Martin ◽  
Frank Williams ◽  
Jeffrey Burton ◽  
Ardem Elmayan ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S362
Author(s):  
Arlin Delgado ◽  
Anthony Kendle ◽  
Tara Randis ◽  
Keyur donda ◽  
Jason L. Salemi ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 226 (1) ◽  
pp. S147-S148
Author(s):  
Claire H. Packer ◽  
Uma Doshi ◽  
Bharti Garg ◽  
Amy M. Valent

Neonatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Emily J.J. Horn-Oudshoorn ◽  
Marijn J. Vermeulen ◽  
Kelly J. Crossley ◽  
Suzan C.M. Cochius-den Otter ◽  
J. Marco Schnater ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The oxygenation index (OI) is a marker for respiratory disease severity and adverse neonatal outcomes. The oxygen saturation index (OSI) is an alternative that allows for continuous noninvasive monitoring, but evidence for clinical use in critically ill neonates is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the OSI as compared to the OI in term neonates with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted including all live-born infants with an isolated CDH between June 2017 and December 2020. Paired values of the OI and OSI in the first 24 h after birth were collected. The relation between OI and OSI measurements was assessed, taking into account arterial pH, body temperature, and preductal versus postductal location of oxygen saturation measurement or arterial blood sampling. The predictive values for pulmonary hypertension, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy, and survival at discharge were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 33 subjects included, 398 paired values of the OI (median 5.8 [3.3–17.2]) and OSI (median 7.3 [3.6–14.4]) were collected. The OI and OSI correlated strongly (<i>r</i> = 0.77, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). The OSI values corresponding to the clinically relevant OI values (10, 15, 20, and 40) were 8.9, 10.9, 12.9, and 20.9, respectively. The predictive values of the OI and OSI were comparable for all adverse neonatal outcomes. No difference was found in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the OI and the OSI for adverse neonatal outcomes. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The OSI could replace the OI in clinical practice in infants with a CDH.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 59-63
Author(s):  
Bekir Kahveci ◽  
Mehmet Sukru Budak ◽  
Ihsan Baglı ◽  
Sedat Akgol

Objective: To evaluate vaginal birth safety by comparing the results of cesarean birth in twin pregnancies with the first twin in vertex presentation. Material and methods: A retrospective cohort study of vertex-presenting twin pregnancies between 32 weeks 0 days and 38 weeks 6 days of gestation was conducted at our hospital from January 2013 to December 2014. The study population was divided according to the mode of birth. The primary outcome was early neonatal mortality, and secondary outcomes related to maternal and perinatal clinical characteristics were analysed between the groups. Results: Of 45,166 births, 1.92% (n = 869) were twin pregnancies. Of the 295 pregnancies meeting the study criteria, 30.16% (n = 89) were in the vaginal birth group, while the remaining 69.84% (n = 206) were in the cesarean birth group. In the vaginal birth group, all the first twins were delivered via vaginal birth, while among the second twins, 82.03% (n = 73) were delivered via vaginal birth, and the remaining 17.97% (n = 16) were delivered via cesarean birth. In the vaginal birth group, the early neonatal mortality rate was 22.4‰ (n = 2), and it was 9.7‰ (n = 2) in the cesarean birth group. All of the deaths occurred in pregnancies under 37 weeks of gestation. Conclusion: The neonatal outcomes between the vaginal birth and cesarean birth groups were similar in term pregnancies with the first in twin vertex presentation, whereas adverse neonatal outcomes were increased in the vaginal birth group in preterm second twin pregnancies.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoav Siegler ◽  
Naphtali Justman ◽  
Gal Bachar ◽  
Roy Lauterbach ◽  
Yaniv Zipori ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective We assessed the association between a short Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration-to-Birth Interval and neonatal outcome. Study design: A retrospective study between 2010- 2020. Eligible cases were singleton preterm live-born neonates born between 24 0/7 and 33 6/7 weeks of gestation and were initiated an ACS course of Betamethasone. We divided the first 48 hours following 1st ACS administration to four-time intervals and compared each time interval to those born more than 48 hours following ACS administration. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcome, including neonatal mortality or any major neonatal morbidity. Results A total of 200 women gave birth less than 48 hours from receiving the first betamethasone injection, and 172 women gave birth within 2-7 days (48-168 hours) from ACS administration. Composite adverse neonatal outcome was higher for neonates born less than 12 hours from initial ACS administration compared to neonates born 2-7 days from first betamethasone injection (55.45% vs. 29.07%, OR 3.45 95% CI [2.02-5.89], p.value<0.0001). However, there was no difference in composite adverse neonatal outcomes between neonates born 12-48 hours following ACS administration and those born after 2-7 days. That was also true after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions 12-24 hours following ACS Administration may be sufficient in reducing the same risk of neonatal morbidities as > 48 hours following ACS administration. It may raise the question regarding the utility of the second dose of ACS.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Lu-Culligan ◽  
Alexandra Tabachnikova ◽  
Maria Tokuyama ◽  
Hannah J. Lee ◽  
Carolina Lucas ◽  
...  

AbstractThe impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination on pregnancy and fertility has become a major topic of public interest. We investigated two of the most widely propagated claims to determine 1) whether COVID-19 mRNA vaccination of mice during early pregnancy is associated with an increased incidence of birth defects or growth abnormalities, and 2) whether COVID-19 mRNA-vaccinated human volunteers exhibit elevated levels of antibodies to the human placental protein syncytin-1. Using a mouse model, we found that intramuscular COVID-19 mRNA vaccination during early pregnancy at gestational age E7.5 did not lead to differences in fetal size by crown-rump length or weight at term, nor did we observe any gross birth defects. In contrast, injection of the TLR3 agonist and double-stranded RNA mimic polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid, or poly(I:C), impacted growth in utero leading to reduced fetal size. No overt maternal illness following either vaccination or poly(I:C) exposure was observed. We also found that term fetuses from vaccinated murine pregnancies exhibit high circulating levels of anti-Spike and anti-RBD antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 consistent with maternal antibody status, indicating transplacental transfer. Finally, we did not detect increased levels of circulating anti-syncytin-1 antibodies in a cohort of COVID-19 vaccinated adults compared to unvaccinated adults by ELISA. Our findings contradict popular claims associating COVID-19 mRNA vaccination with infertility and adverse neonatal outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-209
Author(s):  
Zeynep Gedik Özköse ◽  
Süleyman Cemil Oğlak

Objective This study aimed to determine the effect of advanced maternal age (AMA) on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women aged ≥35 years compared with patients aged 30–34 years. Also, we aimed to analyze the risk estimates of potential confounders to identify whether these variables contributed to the development of adverse pregnancy outcomes or not. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 2284 pregnant women aged ≥35 years at the time of delivery who was delivered in a tertiary referral hospital from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. We further classified these women into two subgroups: 35–39 years as early AMA (EAMA), and ≥40 years as very AMA (VAMA). Pregnancy complications and adverse neonatal outcomes were recorded. Results Compared to younger women, pregnant AMA women had significantly higher risks of complicated pregnancies, including a higher risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, p<0.001), polyhydramnios (p<0.001), cesarean section (p<0.001), stillbirths (p<0.001), major fetal abnormality (p<0.001), preterm delivery (p<0.001), lower birth weight (p<0.001), lower 5-minute Apgar scores (p<0.001), lower umbilical artery blood pH values (p<0.001), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (p<0.001), and length of NICU stay (p<0.001). Conclusion We found a strong and significant association between VAMA and adverse pregnancy outcomes, including an increased risk of GDM, polyhydramnios, cesarean section, and adverse neonatal outcomes, including a higher risk of stillbirths, preterm delivery, lower birth weight, lower 5-minute Apgar scores, and NICU admission.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document