scholarly journals VP04.03: Reliability of International Ovarian Tumour Analysis models in evaluating ovarian tumours at a tertiary care hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (S1) ◽  
pp. 104-104
Author(s):  
N. Rashmi
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (36) ◽  
pp. 2948-2952
Author(s):  
Rajavigneshwari N ◽  
Dhananjay Shrikant Kotasthane ◽  
Koteeswaran G

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (197) ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujan Vaidya ◽  
Sapana Amatya Vaidya

Introduction: Hysterectomy is one of the most common gynaecological procedures performed all over the world. The most frequent indications for hysterectomy are fibroids, abnormal uterine bleeding uterovaginal prolapse and endometriosis. The objective of this study was to present the histopathological patterns of various uterine and adnexal pathologies in the hysterectomy specimens and also to correlate its pre-operative clinical diagnosis with histopathology. Methods: This is a two-year descriptive study of hysterectomy specimens carried out in the Department of Pathology, Patan Academy of Health Sciences (PAHS), Lalitpur, Nepal. Data of all the hysterectomy specimens collected during this period was analyzed.   Results: Out of the 533 cases, fibroid was the most common indication for hysterectomy that was seen in 229 (42.94%) cases followed by uterovaginal prolapse in 101 (18.93%) cases. Leiomyoma was the most common pathology reported in 250 (46.90%) hysterectomy specimens, followed by ovarian tumours in 95 (17.82%) cases. In 17.82% (95/533) cases, no pathology was seen. Overall, the pre-operative indications in 533 cases of hysterectomy were histopathologically verifiable in 487 (91.37%) cases. Conclusions: Though the histopathological examination correlates well with the pre-operative clinical diagnosis, a number of lesions were also encountered as pure incidental findings. Hence, it is mandatory that every hysterectomy specimen should be subjected to histopathological examination so as to ensure better post-operative management. Keywords: adenomyosis; hysterectomy; leiomyoma; tumour; uterovaginal prolapse.  


Author(s):  
Runjhun Jain ◽  
Pooja Patel ◽  
Sharda Goyal

Background: Diagnosis of malignancy in ovarian tumour is always questionable clinically as well as by investigation. Ovarian tumour arise in any age group and any type of body tissue present in tumour like epithelial tissues, germ cells, embryonic cells due to varied histology of ovary and metastatic non ovarian tumours. Aim and objective of the study was to study the correlation ovarian masses regarding their clinical presentation investigation and histo-pathological report.Methods: All the women who presented with lump and/or pain or menstrual problem attending Gynecology, Surgery and oncology OPD of GMCH, Udaipur. Our study design is prospective hospital based study. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM statistical for social sciences (SPSS).Results: In our study, 85.43% were benign tumour and 12.67% were malignant tumour. Among this, 70.87% were cystic, 14.56% were solid and 14.56% were mixed tumours. Mostly they were epithelial tumours (85.43%). Main surgery was total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingoopherectomy. In malignant tumours 61.53% also had Chemotherapy and 0.97 % had debulking.Conclusions: There is strong correlation of ultrasonography finding with histopathology report. Though clinically it was 55 % only. Specificity of the Ultrasonography was 73.33% but sensitivity was 100%. Positive predictive value was 95.65% and negative predictive value was 100%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document