scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of varying discriminatory zones for the prediction of ectopic pregnancy in women with a pregnancy of unknown location

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 770-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Condous ◽  
E. Kirk ◽  
C. Lu ◽  
S. Van Huffel ◽  
O. Gevaert ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divya Mirji ◽  
Shubha Rao ◽  
Akhila Vasudeva ◽  
Roopa P.S

Background: Pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) is defined as the absence of intrauterine or extrauterine sac and Beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin levels (β-HCG) above the discriminatory zone of 1500 mIU/ml. It should be noted that PUL is not always an ectopic; however, by measuring the trends of serum β-HCG, we can determine the outcome of a PUL. Objective: This study aims to identify the various trends β-HCG levels in early pregnancy and evaluate the role of β-HCG in the management strategy. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of pregnant women suspected with early pregnancy. Cases were classified as having a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) by transvaginal ultrasound and ß-HCG greater than 1000 mIU/ml. Expectant management was done until there was a definite outcome. All the collected data were analyzed by employing the chi-square test using SPSS version 20. Results: Among 1200 women who had early first trimester scans, 70 women who fulfilled our criteria of PUL and ß-HCG > 1000 mIU/ml were recruited in this study. In our study, the mean age of the participants was 30±5.6yrs, and the overall mean serum ß-HCG was 3030±522 mIU/ml. The most common outcome observed was an ectopic pregnancy, 47% in our study. We also found the rate of failing pregnancy was 27%, and that of intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) was 25%. Overall, in PUL patients diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy, 9% behaved like IUP, and 4% had an atypical trend in their ß-HCG. Those who had an IUP, 11% had a suboptimal increase in ß-HCG. Conclusion: PUL rate in our unit was 6%. Majority of the outcome of PUL was ectopic in our study. Every case of PUL should be managed based on the initial ß-HCG values, clinical assessments and upon the consent of the patient.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuge Huang ◽  
Yingxuan Zhang ◽  
Dongying Wang ◽  
Huimin Zhang ◽  
Si Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) is a kind of pregnancy that has a positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) test result but the location of pregnancy cannot be determined by ultrasound. Early determination of the location of the pregnancy is important for subsequent treatment. However, there is no study on the characteristics of vaginal microbiota in pregnant women with unknown locations and a model for judging it by vaginal microbiota combined with clinical indicators. Therefore, we designed this study to compare the characteristics of vaginal microbiota in intrauterine and ectopic pregnancy populations during pregnancy with unknown locations and to establish a prediction model for pregnancy locations in PUL populations with clinical indicators.Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter cohort study. 576 eligible participants will be included in this study. Vaginal microbiota was collected from all participants at inclusion, and color Doppler ultrasound was performed weekly. After the locations of pregnancy were determined, participants of intrauterine pregnancy were followed up to their early pregnancy outcome, and participants of ectopic pregnancy were followed up until a none-pregnancy level of β-hCG was confirmed. Discussion: The regular method of judging the location of pregnancy is by color Doppler ultrasound and β-hCG test. We hope to provide earlier clinical methods of prediction for women with unknown locations of pregnancy through this study.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000035378, registration date: 9 August 2020. http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx


2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. M. van Mello ◽  
F. Mol ◽  
H. R. Verhoeve ◽  
M. van Wely ◽  
A. H. Adriaanse ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. Shanti Sri ◽  
P. Kalpana

Background: A pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) is a descriptive term used to classify a woman when she has a positive pregnancy test but no intra- or extra-uterine pregnancy is visualized on transvaginal sonography. The objective of present study was to find out the outcome of women with pregnancy of unknown location presenting to a tertiary care teaching hospital.Methods: The prospective study was conducted from from 1st October 2015 to 31st September 2016, to antenatal out-patient department, at Princess Esra Hospital, Deccan College of medical sciences, Hyderabad. Data was collected for women with early pregnancy or with history of amenorrhea, bleeding or pain. These women were investigated with serum beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin levels at interval of 48 hrs and transvaginal ultrasonography. Expectant management was done for failing pregnancy of unknown location while medical or surgical management was considered for persistent pregnancy of unknown location and ectopic pregnancy.Results: During study period, 9210 patients were admitted, and, of them, 960 (10.42%) were patients with early pregnancy. Meeting the inclusion criteria were 112 (11.6%) patients who formed the study sample. There were 104 (92.85%) patients presenting with amenorrhea, 98 (87.5%) had bleeding and 78 (69.64%) presented with pain. Outcome of 42 (48.83%) patients was failing pregnancy, 31 (36.04%) had intrauterine pregnancy, 8 (9.3%) converted to ectopic pregnancy, while 5 (5.81%) had persistent pregnancy of unknown location. All patients with persistent pregnancy of unknown location and 3 patients with ectopic pregnancy were medically treated. Three patients having an ectopic pregnancy were managed surgically.Conclusions: Management of choice for asymptomatic patients having pregnancy of unknown location is expectant management. Most of the patients suspected to have PUL resolved either into F-PUL or IUP with expectant management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-9
Author(s):  
I. V. Gadayeva ◽  
I. D. Khokhlova ◽  
T. A. Dzhibladze

Ectopic pregnancy is the most common cause of emergency conditions in gynecology. The main clinical manifestations of ectopic pregnancy, in the background of signs of pregnancy, are the menstrual irregularities, delayed menstruation, spotting (the most classic clinical picture), pain syndrome (with and without irradiation to the rectum, thigh) of varying intensity (depending on the type of the ectopic pregnancy), signs of intra-abdominal bleeding. The key to successful treatment is timely diagnosis and qualified, adequate medical care. The main laboratory and instrumental methods for diagnosing the ectopic pregnancy are the determination of the -subunit of hCG in blood serum (diagnostic accuracy of 85%) and ultrasound (diagnostic accuracy of 78100%). The treatment of ectopic pregnancy is surgical, the laparoscopic access is preferred. Laparotomy access is indicated for severe adhesions, hemorrhagic shock caused by significant intraperitoneal bleeding. The surgical intervention during tubal pregnancy is tubectomy. Tubotomy (retention of the fallopian tube) is irrational, since the operated fallopian tube causes a recurrence of tubal pregnancy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 1107-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suneeta Senapati ◽  
Kurt T. Barnhart

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document