How strong is public support for unilateral climate policy and what drives it?

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. e484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liam F. McGrath ◽  
Thomas Bernauer
2010 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Dröge

AbstractBorder measures to support unilateral climate policy efforts are being discussed in particular in the EU and the US. The EU has stipulated in its 2008 Directive on the European Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) that in order to address the potential for carbon leakage, an inclusion of importers in the ETS could be a policy option amongst others. A climate policy adjustment at the border could take various forms and it could be motivated in three ways. First, trade measures could be announced as a “stick”, sanctioning those countries who are not willing to cooperate on climate protection. Second, the border adjustment for importers (making them pay at the border according to the carbon they emitted for producing the traded good) or a rebate for exporters for the CO


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 4146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Fritz ◽  
Max Koch

The emerging concept of sustainable welfare attempts to integrate environmental sustainability and social welfare research. Oriented at a mid-term re-embedding of Western production and consumption norms into planetary limits, it suggests the development of “eco-social” policies in the rich countries. In this theoretical context, this article empirically investigates the relationships between attitudes towards welfare and climate policy in 23 countries. Using 2016 data from the European Social Survey, we explored patterns of synergy between both kinds of policies as well as effects of crowding-out, where support for one kind of policy involves refusing the other. Since previous research addressed the role of welfare states and their institutional foundations in establishing environmentally sustainable societies, we studied how attitudes towards welfare and climate policies differ according to welfare regime affiliation. Additionally, we examined how a range of socio-demographic and political factors such as class, education, income, and political position shape people’s views on welfare and climate policy goals. The results of a multiple correspondence analysis indicate that the simultaneous support of welfare and climate policies follows welfare regime lines in that this support is the highest among social-democratic countries. However, also some conservative and Mediterranean countries score high in this regard. At the individual level, people with a higher education, employees in socio-cultural professions, and voters of moderate left and green parties display the highest mutual support for welfare and climate policies.


Author(s):  
Christoph Böhringer ◽  
Carolyn Fischer ◽  
Knut Einar Rosendahl

2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Ritter ◽  
Mark Schopf

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarrod Hayes ◽  
Janelle Knox-Hayes

Why has Europe implemented a quite-proactive climate policy while the US has adopted a far less ambitious climate strategy? Does variation in security concerns or other factors better explain this difference in policy? Using a multimethod case study approach, the authors find that in the US, constructions of climate change as a security threat play an important role in developing public support. In Europe, leadership and opportunity discourses predominate. Other factors including centralization of governance, trust in the technocratic elite, and cultural norms contribute to the variation in policy construction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document