Fluctuating asymmetry, mating success, body size and heterozygosity in Coenagrion scitulum (Rambur) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae)

2001 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianmaria Carchini ◽  
Flavia Chiarotti ◽  
Marco di Domenico ◽  
Marco Mattoccia ◽  
Giacomo Paganotti
2005 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 707-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianmaria CARCHINI ◽  
Marco Di DOMENICO ◽  
Flavia CHIAROTTI ◽  
Carla TANZILLI ◽  
Tiziana PACIONE

2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-424
Author(s):  
Gregorio Moreno-Rueda ◽  
Abelardo Requena-Blanco ◽  
Francisco J Zamora-Camacho ◽  
Mar Comas ◽  
Guillem Pascual

Abstract Predation is one of the main selective forces in nature, frequently selecting potential prey for developing escape strategies. Escape ability is typically influenced by several morphological parameters, such as morphology of the locomotor appendices, muscular capacity, body mass, or fluctuating asymmetry, and may differ between sexes and age classes. In this study, we tested the relationship among these variables and jumping performance in 712 Iberian green frogs Pelophylax perezi from an urban population. The results suggest that the main determinant of jumping capacity was body size (explaining 48% of variance). Larger frogs jumped farther, but jumping performance reached an asymptote for the largest frogs. Once controlled by structural body size, the heaviest frogs jumped shorter distances, suggesting a trade-off between fat storage and jumping performance. Relative hind limb length also determined a small but significant percentage of variance (2.4%) in jumping performance—that is, the longer the hind limbs, the greater the jumping capacity. Juveniles had relatively shorter and less muscular hind limbs than adults (for a given body size), and their jumping performance was poorer. In our study population, the hind limbs of the frogs were very symmetrical, and we found no effect of fluctuating asymmetry on jumping performance. Therefore, our study provides evidence that jumping performance in frogs is not only affected by body size, but also by body mass and hind limb length, and differ between age classes.


1990 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 648-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.M. Neems ◽  
A.J. McLachlan ◽  
R. Chambers
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 987-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Serrano-Meneses ◽  
A. Córdoba-Aguilar ◽  
V. Méndez ◽  
S.J. Layen ◽  
T. Székely

2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Cunningham

The expansion of human evolutionary theory into the domain of personal and environmental determinants of mating strategies is applauded. Questions are raised about the relation between fluctuating asymmetry (FA), testosterone, and body size and their effects on male behavior and outcomes. Low FA males' short-term mating pattern is considered in the context of an evolved tendency for closer and longer human relationships.


2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-624
Author(s):  
Sally Walters

Not all of the studies cited in the target article as evidence that fluctuating asymmetry (FA) predicts male mating success demonstrate that the observed asymmetry is, in fact, FA. FA is a population-level pattern of differences between sides. Unless the population-level distributional criteria of bilateral traits are reported, the meaning of asymmetry in individuals is unknown.


2010 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANTHONY HERREL ◽  
JENNIFER A. MOORE ◽  
EVAN M. BREDEWEG ◽  
NICOLA J. NELSON

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document